chriskay wrote:Sounds perverse to me; there are many cars where no gas=stall.
The Citigo I was driving certainly had no issues with no gas but it was still something I wasn't expecting.
chriskay wrote:Sounds perverse to me; there are many cars where no gas=stall.
TheInsanity1234 wrote: No, he told me not to apply any gas after I tried to do so the first time, so I just went with the flow and I never applied gas when pulling away for the duration of the lesson. Excellent, indeed, but downright annoying when you need to try and pull away quickly.
chriskay wrote:Sounds perverse to me; there are many cars where no gas=stall.
Horse wrote:That may well be true, but for the duration of the lesson, did you need to do so?
TheInsanity1234 wrote:Horse wrote:That may well be true, but for the duration of the lesson, did you need to do so?
For the 30 minutes of driving, in a private road complex with about 5 other cars on it, no I did not.
But it's a useful skill to have, wouldn't you say?
Horse wrote:Also, from your [future] passengers' point of view, they'll be happier with a smooth journey (and less likely to vomit in your car).
Horse wrote:Ooh that's an interesting response Close to the old chestnut / myth that 'You need a powerful engine in case you need to get out of trouble' . . . Trouble that a bigger engine is more likely to get you into
So where will it end? Will you demand a more and more powerful car to get into smaller an smaller gaps
I think you said this was your first lesson? So in that 30 minutes, which key skills would you expect to cover, and which key skills might have to wait?
From my experience of teaching novice riders (and experienced, but lapsed, riders returning to biking) the key thing to teach when pulling away is how to stop
When it comes to surviving on the road, the key skill to develop and use is what goes on with your eyes and brain, identifying hazards and taking appropriate action early.
When it comes to surviving on the road, the key skill to develop and use is what goes on with your eyes and brain, identifying hazards and taking appropriate action early.
Fair enough. I noticed that sometimes, when I checked mirrors and things before manoeuvring, I had to double check what I saw in the mirrors, simply because I was too busy thinking about what I was doing to take in what I was looking at :/ This is one of the things I want to avoid when out on the public roads at 17, is having to learn all the necessary skills in situations where one botched mirror check could be the difference between a safe negotiation of a roundabout, and a crunched up bumper.
Horse wrote:OK, two things:
1. When you do a mirror check, don't look at your mirror. Eh? What? No, look at what you can see, then tell yourself what is, in detail. So, "mirror" Vs "red car, closing fast". That leads to 2.
2. Identify the hazard - look for detail, hunt it down! Then decide how it could affect you. So, "" education car, closing fast - he's going to struggle to pass before the end of the dual carriageway so I need to ease off the throttle"*
* You knew I'd work it in somehow
chriskay wrote:Horse wrote:chriskay wrote:Sounds perverse to me; there are many cars where no gas=stall.
Such as?
Any car with a low mass flywheel and with a clutch you expect to last more than 5000 miles.
TheInsanity1234 wrote:Horse wrote:OK, two things:
1. When you do a mirror check, don't look at your mirror. Eh? What? No, look at what you can see, then tell yourself what is, in detail. So, "mirror" Vs "red car, closing fast". That leads to 2.
2. Identify the hazard - look for detail, hunt it down! Then decide how it could affect you. So, "" education car, closing fast - he's going to struggle to pass before the end of the dual carriageway so I need to ease off the throttle"*
* You knew I'd work it in somehow
I was actually looking inside the mirror and looking at things in there, but it's just that my brain was processing the action as well as the information, which meant I would occasionally look, then return to the forward view, only to look again at the mirror, because I wasn't sure what I actually was looking at in there.
chriskay wrote:Clearly not, but who can say what type of car he may own or drive in the future? I myself have had the opportunity of driving cars in that category and the owners were pleased that I didn't slip the clutch.
chriskay wrote: with a clutch you expect to last more than 5000 miles.
Horse wrote:Again, two points:
1. The what will come with time and experience - but that can work against safety!
2. Say what you see, out aloud. It helps understanding and remembering.
chriskay wrote:TheInsanity1234 wrote:I would hope that any car would have a clutch that would last more than 5k miles.
Well, yes, provided you don't mistreat it. If you're prepared to search through the 400+ pages of the thread "Flemke, is this your McLaren?" on Pistonheads you will read about some unsympathetic oaf who destroyed the clutch on his new Porsche Carrera GT in 500 miles.
(Apart from that, it's a fascinating read: I've been driven round the Nordschleif by Flemke in one of his cars and he's not only a superb driver but also a genuinely pleasant person).
martine wrote:In my experience the first stage is more about making the car do what you want, when you want and under smooth control. Once you're getting on well with that, your attention can move more outside and dealing with other road users, tricky junctions etc. When you've got that as well then it's time for your test!
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests