jcochrane wrote:For me the Boxter is disappointing the "S" far better but better still the Caymen S. [...] Get a bend slightly wrong and the car will sort it out for you.
But it's a lot of fun getting bends right in an S
jcochrane wrote:For me the Boxter is disappointing the "S" far better but better still the Caymen S. [...] Get a bend slightly wrong and the car will sort it out for you.
Gareth wrote:Boxsters and Caymans, especially the 'S' versions, can let an adequate driver delude themselves into believing they have a measure of greatness ... and an appropriate Alfa can put them back in their place
Gareth wrote:jcochrane wrote:For me the Boxter is disappointing the "S" far better but better still the Caymen S. [...] Get a bend slightly wrong and the car will sort it out for you.
But it's a lot of fun getting bends right in an S
StressedDave wrote:waremark wrote:I don't understand this Boxster bashing. I think its lovely.
Is the car Stressed D doesn't like a Z4M? I really liked that too.
I like pretty well all cars.
On a smooth road it's pretty good. On anything English the tendency for the rear end of the car to spend large amounts of time not in contact with the road surface makes it a sh*tter.
waremark wrote:I don't understand this Boxster bashing. I think its lovely.
Is the car Stressed D doesn't like a Z4M? I really liked that too.
I like pretty well all cars.
martine wrote: Ha - yes I know what you mean but then again...it seems a bit perverse and you might as well go for a bad handling, slow, unreliable...errr Alfa anyone?
(sorry - that was a joke)
Angus wrote:martine wrote: Ha - yes I know what you mean but then again...it seems a bit perverse and you might as well go for a bad handling, slow, unreliable...errr Alfa anyone?
(sorry - that was a joke)
IT HAD BETTER BE
sussex2 wrote:I know that some makers and Porsche may be one of them that fit the larger wheels to UK cars as we tend to like them; why I cannot imagine with our rough and irregular road surfaces.
TheInsanity1234 wrote:I appear to be one of the very few young'uns who appreciate and value ride comfort much more than being able to take hairpin bends at 1895737.6 mph.
I'm more into Range Rovers rather than Lambo's.
martine wrote:TheInsanity1234 wrote:I'm more into Range Rovers rather than Lambo's.
No, no, NO! Wash your mouth out 1234.
Huracan
akirk wrote:TheInsanity1234 wrote:I appear to be one of the very few young'uns who appreciate and value ride comfort much more than being able to take hairpin bends at 1895737.6 mph.
I'm more into Range Rovers rather than Lambo's.
A nice tuned SC 5.0l RR should do then
Alasdair
TheInsanity1234 wrote:martine wrote:TheInsanity1234 wrote:I'm more into Range Rovers rather than Lambo's.
No, no, NO! Wash your mouth out 1234.
Huracan
Clearly there was a misunderstanding.
I meant to say I'll have a Lambo any day, but if I was offered the choice between a Range Rover, or a Lamborghini, I'd take the Rangie!akirk wrote:TheInsanity1234 wrote:I appear to be one of the very few young'uns who appreciate and value ride comfort much more than being able to take hairpin bends at 1895737.6 mph.
I'm more into Range Rovers rather than Lambo's.
A nice tuned SC 5.0l RR should do then
Alasdair
I really want 2 Range Rovers, a 5.0 SCV8 and the 4.4 TDV8, then take them both to be discreetly overfinched.
Petrol for making a racket, diesel for mile-munching.
Then I'd grab myself a Defender, and take that to be overfinched too.
This'll be my about town car
Then I'd search out a massive SUV hybrid with a V8 petrol so I can chug into central London free of charge
Oh and a Jaguar XKR convertible with a V8 for those summer days!
That would be my perfect garage.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests