Horse wrote:Gareth wrote:Horse wrote:How are they able to consistantly get associates to test standard, then?
Are you claiming that they're consistent?
I have no idea, but as a paying member of the public (OK: 'unlikely but potential' ) I'd hope they were.
My opinion is based on two points. First is that my impression has been that pass rates vary considerably between observers, which is also what I'd expect from a group of volunteers. Second is that uniformity of standards can be improved with a certain amount of cross-checking, and I know that the IAM has been doing this to some degree in recent times, although it's hard to know how well it's working.