akirk wrote:it is indicative of a society which cares more about surface appearances (he had the bit of paper) than reality and ability
ROG wrote:I have looked at the IMI thing and to be honest it will not prevent individuals or groups from still putting their own spin on issues so what is the use of it ?
Gareth wrote:ROG wrote:I have looked at the IMI thing and to be honest it will not prevent individuals or groups from still putting their own spin on issues so what is the use of it ?
It's an attempt to move in the right direction, to work towards a more consistent experience for associates, a step on the way to helping the worst observers get closer to the best, in terms of content delivery and results.
Perfect is the enemy of better ...
Gareth wrote:It's simply an attempt by the IAM to fix the problem of widely disparate standards of observers across the country, from pretty poor to very good. The IAM has slightly painted itself into a corner by pushing a single product, (SfL), and wants as much as it can for the associate experience to be the same whichever group they sign up with.
I've read a number of comments that suggest that IMI is mainly a box-ticking exercise for competant observers, and that the only ones who should be concerned are those who are nearer the incompetant end of the spectrum.
Gareth wrote:ROG wrote:I have looked at the IMI thing and to be honest it will not prevent individuals or groups from still putting their own spin on issues so what is the use of it ?
It's an attempt to move in the right direction, to work towards a more consistent experience for associates, a step on the way to helping the worst observers get closer to the best, in terms of content delivery and results.
ROG wrote:I have no problem with addressing any issues after that issue has been assessed as needing to be fixed but why fix something that is not broken ........
Gareth wrote:ROG wrote:I have looked at the IMI thing and to be honest it will not prevent individuals or groups from still putting their own spin on issues so what is the use of it ?
It's an attempt to move in the right direction, to work towards a more consistent experience for associates, a step on the way to helping the worst observers get closer to the best, in terms of content delivery and results.
Gareth wrote:It's simply an attempt by the IAM to fix the problem of widely disparate standards of observers across the country, from pretty poor to very good. The IAM has slightly painted itself into a corner by pushing a single product, (SfL), and wants as much as it can for the associate experience to be the same whichever group they sign up with.
I've read a number of comments that suggest that IMI is mainly a box-ticking exercise for competant observers, and that the only ones who should be concerned are those who are nearer the incompetant end of the spectrum.
Return to Advanced Driving Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests