IAM masters/RoSPA gold?

Discussion on Advanced and Defensive Driving.

Postby Mr Cholmondeley-Warner » Fri Jun 05, 2015 7:34 pm


Well I'm pleased to say I'm still a RoSPA Advanced Tutor, therefore still Gold, as of about 90 minutes ago. It still felt pretty difficult. I can't say if IAM Masters would be more difficult, or not.
User avatar
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner
 
Posts: 2928
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Swindon, Wilts




Postby true blue » Fri Jun 05, 2015 11:54 pm


StressedDave wrote:
RobC wrote:Reducing the speed limit in accident blackspots may not be the answer but possibly its better than doing nothing and waiting for the next fatality :|

But just changing the number on the stick will do nothing. It doesn't even tally with using the three 'E's as there's no education, no change in engineering that would make the road safer and unless you're particularly unlucky, no enforement either.


That said, I always feel more self-conscious if I take a flexible view of a 50 limit than NSL. Perhaps the theory behind the new, lower limits hinges on an inate sense of guilt that every Englishman is born with?

On the other hand, if I lived in Gloucestershire I might feel differently. Happily Cambridgeshire and Suffolk (my usual playgrounds) are sufficiently behind the times that they've not caught up with the latest speed reduction fetish.
true blue
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 11:51 am
Location: Cambridge

Postby RobC » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:02 am


Ancient wrote:Would you consider the drivers on the original Italian Job as "Advanced Drivers" (the characters, not the actors)?


Stunt driving is not the same skill, they may be skilled drivers but they cant call themselves IAM or Rospa members unless they are.
National Safe Driving Enterprise CIC
RobC
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:53 am




Postby Gareth » Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:15 am


RobC wrote:
TripleS wrote:Based on my observations, whenever there's been a bad shunt on rural roads in our part of the country, there's a clamour for a reduced speed limit on that section of road. What these people fail to recognise is that many of these shunts happen to people who take no notice of the limits anyhow; so lowering the limit isn't going to help.

Reducing the speed limit in accident blackspots may not be the answer but possibly its better than doing nothing and waiting for the next fatality :|

If, as TripleS suggests, those who had accidents weren't abiding by the prevailing speed limit, then all that reducing the speed limit does is penalise those who do abide by it. I would have thought this would be easy to understand.
there is only the road, nothing but the road ...
Gareth
 
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Berkshire




Postby RobC » Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:54 am


mefoster wrote:
RobC wrote:
Ancient wrote:Would you consider the drivers on the original Italian Job as "Advanced Drivers" (the characters, not the actors)?


Stunt driving is not the same skill, they may be skilled drivers but they cant call themselves IAM or Rospa members unless they are.


Or do you think AD begins and ends with those two organisations?


Certainly not it depends on our definition of advanced, but driving down sewers and on the roofs of buildings isn't mine :)
There are lots of other organisations and courses and the basic IAM with a pass rate of 90% isn't the most difficult to achieve.
Other advanced drivers include the National Express Advanced Driver Course, DVSA Driving Examiners, DVSA Fleet, Cardington Special Test, MoD EFAD, Regimental Staff car Course Car, Defence Staff Car Course Car, Wedgewood Vehicle Advanced Course Commercial, Bentley Chauffeurs Course, DIA DipDE, the list goes on.

I assess full licence holders in my job every day. There are lots of drivers with advanced skills without qualification. If you asked me who was the more advanced driver, one of the Italian Job stunt drivers or someone who had passed their basic IAM 30 years ago, I wouldn't be able to make that judgement without first assessing their driving.

What would be your definition of AD?
Last edited by RobC on Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
National Safe Driving Enterprise CIC
RobC
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:53 am




Postby MGF » Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:09 am


mefoster wrote:Political limits that have nothing whatsoever to do with road safety can be found all over.


This comment a better example of limited thinking. Road safety is very much a political issue.
MGF
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Postby MGF » Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:21 am


RobC wrote:
StressedDave wrote:
RobC wrote:Sounds like a boy racers charter. Unfortunately Speed limits ARE a target to some.
What you would find is a lot more 17 to 24 year olds killing themselves driving their Corsa's albeit at perfectly legal speeds :shock: .


I doubt a change to the speed limit would do anything to the accident rate as it is relatively ignored once traffic density is reduced.


If that were the case it would be pointless having speed limits :shock:


Speed limits probably have little or no effect on those who seek excitement and risk from their driving.

Generally though , people drive at a speed they feel comfortable driving at. Exceeding the speed limit, for many, is uncomfortable due to the risk of being caught. For most of us speed limits do have an effect on speed if only by limiting the extent of the excess speed.
MGF
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Postby RobC » Sun Jun 07, 2015 12:51 pm


Hi MGF

I fully agree with your comments for most drivers, however I drove with many 17/18 year olds when I taught learners and had many young (mainly male) drivers who saw changes of speed limit as a target.

True they may be seeking excitement and perhaps also under peer pressure, however one of the main problems is a non mature frontal lobe in 17 to 24 year olds and subsequent failure to assess risk.
If they thought they were going to die or be seriously injured then perhaps they would drive differently :cry:

Rob
National Safe Driving Enterprise CIC
RobC
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:53 am




Postby Horse » Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:35 am


RobC wrote: If they thought they were going to die or be seriously injured then perhaps they would drive differently :cry:


Do any drivers, excepting a few who are truly suicidal, deliberately make choices which they know make result in death or serious injury? Surely most make decisions they - rightly or wrongly - think they'll get away with . . .
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby RobC » Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:52 am


Horse wrote:
RobC wrote: If they thought they were going to die or be seriously injured then perhaps they would drive differently :cry:


Do any drivers, excepting a few who are truly suicidal, deliberately make choices which they know make result in death or serious injury? Surely most make decisions they - rightly or wrongly - think they'll get away with . . .


Agree they probably think they're going to get away with it. The trrouble is some drivers assess risk better than others, some are inexperienced, others are risk takers, some have an over favourable opinion of their driving ability or a combination of all those. If they knew they would be killed or seriously injured then they would no doubt drive differently..... (unless as you say they are suicidal) :cry:
National Safe Driving Enterprise CIC
RobC
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:53 am




Postby akirk » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:16 pm


Horse wrote:
RobC wrote: If they thought they were going to die or be seriously injured then perhaps they would drive differently :cry:


Do any drivers, excepting a few who are truly suicidal, deliberately make choices which they know make result in death or serious injury? Surely most make decisions they - rightly or wrongly - think they'll get away with . . .


I think that they frequently make those decisions deliberately - but the disconnect lies in not accepting / seeing / understanding the link between those decisions and the likely consequences...

Alasdair
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

Postby Horse » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:45 pm


akirk wrote:
Horse wrote:
RobC wrote: If they thought they were going to die or be seriously injured then perhaps they would drive differently :cry:


Do any drivers, excepting a few who are truly suicidal, deliberately make choices which they know make result in death or serious injury? Surely most make decisions they - rightly or wrongly - think they'll get away with . . .


I think that they frequently make those decisions deliberately - but the disconnect lies in not accepting / seeing / understanding the link between those decisions and the likely consequences...


OK, so when even 'advanced' drivers can make mistakes, how can that be changed?
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby JamesAllport » Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:33 pm


RobC wrote:What would be your definition of AD?


Someone who appreciates that there's always something new to learn and that they're only as good as the worst bit of their last drive.

James
Only two things matter: attitude & entry speeds.
JamesAllport
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Chichester, West Sussex




Postby Horse » Mon Jun 08, 2015 2:26 pm


JamesAllport wrote:
RobC wrote:What would be your definition of AD?


Someone who appreciates that there's always something new to learn and that they're only as good as the worst bit of their last drive.


So you could be an advanced driver but still be totally sh1t as long as you realised it? :) :lol:
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby akirk » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:58 pm


Horse wrote:
akirk wrote:
Horse wrote:Do any drivers, excepting a few who are truly suicidal, deliberately make choices which they know make result in death or serious injury? Surely most make decisions they - rightly or wrongly - think they'll get away with . . .


I think that they frequently make those decisions deliberately - but the disconnect lies in not accepting / seeing / understanding the link between those decisions and the likely consequences...


OK, so when even 'advanced' drivers can make mistakes, how can that be changed?


Sadly - you can't remove all mistakes, humans are fallible!

Horse wrote:
JamesAllport wrote:
RobC wrote:What would be your definition of AD?


Someone who appreciates that there's always something new to learn and that they're only as good as the worst bit of their last drive.


So you could be an advanced driver but still be totally sh1t as long as you realised it? :) :lol:


:D

maybe need to add to James' description...
both of those are true, but it also sits alongside a certain ability level or higher - and an understanding of their driving in the scale of what is possible, and a desire to move along that scale...

Alasdair
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Driving Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


cron