Black Boxes and the future

Discussion on Advanced and Defensive Driving.

Postby WhoseGeneration » Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:25 am


jont wrote:I'm fairly heavily involved in future technology for cars for the day job. I've just bought a Caterham while I still can :lol: Another colleague continues to run a Porsche 944 in preference to anything more modern.



Meanwhile, what could possibly go wrong with ever growing amounts of software written by the lowest bidder....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/15 ... re_glitch/


It's all because the politicians have become involved in the specifications of many products, driven by the so called environmental concerns.
The truth is, the products have a short lifespan and need regular replacing, meaning the environmental cost is greater.
Always a commentary, spoken or not.
Keeps one safe. One hopes.
WhoseGeneration
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby akirk » Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:52 am


jont wrote:I'm fairly heavily involved in future technology for cars for the day job. I've just bought a Caterham while I still can :lol: Another colleague continues to run a Porsche 944 in preference to anything more modern.

Meanwhile, what could possibly go wrong with ever growing amounts of software written by the lowest bidder....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/15 ... re_glitch/


well put...
I am in the process of starting to find some older cars - main criteria in discussion with my mechanic is lack of computers :) less to go wrong, all easily fixable with a lump hammer, nothing which won't be able to be repaired for the next 50 years :)

Alasdair
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

Postby jont » Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:46 am


Oh look, another one....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/08 ... _analysis/

Maybe I should have gone for a Caterham running on carbs? :lol:
User avatar
jont
 
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Postby Garrison » Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:30 am


jont wrote:Oh look, another one....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/08 ... _analysis/

Maybe I should have gone for a Caterham running on carbs? :lol:

Oh, is yours not a Ford CrossFlow or Pinto ? :wink:
Garrison
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:55 am
Location: London

Postby Mike H » Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:07 pm


I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

http://www.aviva.co.uk/drive/
IAM; RoADAR
User avatar
Mike H
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:51 pm
Location: Cotswolds

Postby Pyrolol » Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:16 pm


Mike H wrote:I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

http://www.aviva.co.uk/drive/


I actually used one of those apps (Admiral's one - AppyDriver) for my insurance this year.

I drove 250 miles with it on, trying throughout to minimize G force and avoid other things I thought they might penalize (for example: no night driving, no rural driving, no speeding). I ended up getting about 10% off (*).

I probably wouldn't do it again (it's just not justifyable now I'm into the <£500 bracket), but I could see it being a good idea for younger drivers who are paying £1000+.

--

*: Yes, I was annoyed with that. Obviously it can't have been incompetence... - I think I blame bad road surfaces bouncing my phone around (I don't have a proper cradle) and everybody else also trying to game the system (since it's still early days).
Pyrolol
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Enfield

Postby Kimosabe » Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:39 pm


WhoseGeneration wrote:
Kimosabe wrote:I see Garmin have brought out a satnav with a built in dashcam. It's also possible to use googlemaps and street view on some satnavs, so how long before it's possible to track (and possibly even control) cars via their satnavs and built-in radar guidance tech? Or even read the information remotely and catch drivers eg.speeding without even needing to see them do it?

My mind is a terrible place sometimes :roll: :lol:


The problem about your postulations is that there would need to be common, approved, technical standards laid down by a governmental authority, or probably these days, EU authority.
Those standards "should" ensure no possibility of error and therein lies the problem and cost.

That said, all this stuff is, like much other in the digital arena, wet dreams for politicians.
However, remember, it tends to only control those who are prepared to be controlled but that's all politicians need, to control the majority.
Oh, Huxley and Orwell how prescient you both were.


I feel it's simply a matter of time before drivers are remotely observed, not to mention requiring a username and password :x to drive a car and remote telemetry will be de rigeur. And so the iCar (with its own app.) came to be.... sometimes I think motorised road travel is still in it's infancy in many ways.
A wise man once told me that "it depends". I sometimes agree.
Kimosabe
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:30 pm

Postby Horse » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:26 pm


Pyrolol wrote:
Mike H wrote:I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

*: Yes, I was annoyed with that. Obviously it can't have been incompetence... - I think I blame bad road surfaces bouncing my phone around (I don't have a proper cradle) and everybody else also trying to game the system (since it's still early days).


Hmmm . . . how long before someone markets a cheap gyro-stabilised cradle . . . ?
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby Garrison » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:54 pm


Mike H wrote:I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

http://www.aviva.co.uk/drive/

+1. We are with Aviva but I have not done. We have 2 cars with them but as the insurance is low now (£219 on the MR2 and £471 on the 911 Turbo, both fully comp), we did not participate.
Garrison
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:55 am
Location: London

Postby WhoseGeneration » Fri Jul 17, 2015 9:16 pm


Kimosabe wrote:
I feel it's simply a matter of time before drivers are remotely observed,


Chip implanted at birth, it's the only way forward.
Always a commentary, spoken or not.
Keeps one safe. One hopes.
WhoseGeneration
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby jont » Sat Jul 18, 2015 11:21 am


Horse wrote:
Pyrolol wrote:
Mike H wrote:I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

*: Yes, I was annoyed with that. Obviously it can't have been incompetence... - I think I blame bad road surfaces bouncing my phone around (I don't have a proper cradle) and everybody else also trying to game the system (since it's still early days).


Hmmm . . . how long before someone markets a cheap gyro-stabilised cradle . . . ?

Wouldn't just heavily fluid damped do an almost as good job?
User avatar
jont
 
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Postby revian » Sat Jul 18, 2015 4:18 pm


WhoseGeneration wrote:
Kimosabe wrote:
I feel it's simply a matter of time before drivers are remotely observed,


Chip implanted at birth, it's the only way forward.

That's just your stored programme control speaking...
Wirral
revian
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:37 pm

Postby akirk » Sat Jul 18, 2015 7:58 pm


Horse wrote:
Pyrolol wrote:
Mike H wrote:I see that Aviva are now offering 'tailored discount' of up to 20% on car insurance for drivers who download their (smartphone) app, drive 200 miles, and then report the score to Aviva, the score being reportedly based on Braking, Acceleration and Cornering....

*: Yes, I was annoyed with that. Obviously it can't have been incompetence... - I think I blame bad road surfaces bouncing my phone around (I don't have a proper cradle) and everybody else also trying to game the system (since it's still early days).


Hmmm . . . how long before someone markets a cheap gyro-stabilised cradle . . . ?


that will be one of these:
Image

just search on gimbal phone holder - used to steady the phone when shooting movies - should iron out a few bumps :) won't affect gps measured metrics, only gyro measured ones...

Alasdair
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

Postby Garrison » Sun Jul 19, 2015 9:37 am


StressedDave wrote:AIUI the phone apps are primarily GPS ...

So no point for me to participate then given I am mostly in high risk areas of Tower Hamlets, City of London, ...
Garrison
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:55 am
Location: London

Postby akirk » Sun Jul 19, 2015 9:43 am


how does GPS measure g-force? is it accurate enough to really detect different types of cornering?

camera gimbal heads are expensive - but you could pick up a gimbal bearing for c. £60 - or pop along to a yachty boot sale on the south coast and get one for a few pounds - build your own stand...
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Driving Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests