Sru_1980 wrote:I always leave a 2 second gap, I'm not sure I'd say it was too close, other than in wet or otherwise treacherous conditions.
ROG wrote:Sru_1980 wrote:I always leave a 2 second gap, I'm not sure I'd say it was too close, other than in wet or otherwise treacherous conditions.
When following other vehicles who are in the same conditions, does extending the gap actually make any difference as they has the same conditions to stop in
Obviously, it will take longer to stop for stationary, or near stationary, objects when grip is reduced.
fungus wrote:I think two seconds is too close, and like JB, I prefer a three to four second gap. There are obvious advantages to the larger gap. Firstly it affords a much better forward view, allowing more time to react to developing situations.
Secondly you can plan overtakes better, as you can see the gap oppening up where you can move offside for that final view before committing to the overtake.
See http:/www.youtube.com/watch?=KRrAdlDt5Tk
Note the car following the LGV is not able to get a forward view, and can't even move slightly off side. Of course if you have a powerfull car it is much easier. But if you don't have the power, should you be attempting the overtake anyway?
Nigel ADI
IAM trainee observer
oxtondriver wrote:Hello people,
Ive been lurking for a while now but this is my first post.
Really its a quick question ive just watched the clip of the Saab overtaking, and towards the end of the clip he overtakes the car that pulls out in front of him. While completing this overtake he crosses into the chevron area. I can see the line around the chevron area is broken so my understanding is he can enter the area if it is necessary and it is safe to do so.
My question is, is over taking considered to be a necessary action therefore allowing him to enter the chevron area?
Sorry this is a bit of topic.
Thanks Kris.
oxtondriver wrote:Hello people,
Ive been lurking for a while now but this is my first post.
Really its a quick question ive just watched the clip of the Saab overtaking, and towards the end of the clip he overtakes the car that pulls out in front of him. While completing this overtake he crosses into the chevron area. I can see the line around the chevron area is broken so my understanding is he can enter the area if it is necessary and it is safe to do so.
My question is, is over taking considered to be a necessary action therefore allowing him to enter the chevron area?
Sorry this is a bit of topic.
Thanks Kris.
oxtondriver wrote:I always thought overtaking would not be classed as a nesassery reason to enter the chevroned area so I have never done it.
adiNigel wrote:There has been quite a bit of talk about a ghost lane.
What does this phrase refer to?
Nigel
oxtondriver wrote:I now feel if it is safe and convenient to overtake using the chevron area then im going to take advantage of it.
Thanks
Kris.
adiNigel wrote:There has been quite a bit of talk about a [color=red]ghost lane[/color
7db wrote:On necessity - it's not what it used to be. Essentially there's no line offence available for those sort of chevrons (nor indeed had they had solid borders) -- simply a question of careful and considerate driving.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests