Do driving instructors drive like learners?

Forum for general chat, news, blogs, humour, jokes etc.

Postby michael769 » Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:55 pm


My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.
Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open
Thomas Robert Dewar(1864-1930)
michael769
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Livingston

Postby jont » Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:58 pm


michael769 wrote:My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.

and perhaps why they treat pre-test training with such contempt?
User avatar
jont
 
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Postby PeterE » Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:00 pm


michael769 wrote:My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.

Indeed, and it encourages the view that "spirited" driving is something diametrically opposed to "learner" driving, especially on the point of legal compliance, which, as we all know here, isn't necessarily so.
"No matter how elaborate the rules might be, there is not a glimmer of hope that they can cover the infinite variation in real driving situations." (Stephen Haley, from "Mind Driving")
User avatar
PeterE
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:29 pm
Location: Stockport, Cheshire




Postby MGF » Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:29 pm


Isn't driving "like a learner" driving below DSA test standard?
MGF
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Postby martine » Tue Nov 15, 2011 5:07 pm


crr003 wrote:I've just taken Part 2 and was advised to drive "as if giving a demonstration to a learner of what's required to pass the learner test, but not drive like a learner",

Yes I was told that as well - what I understood they meant is: obey all the rules and DSA guidance but drive 'confidently'.
crr003 wrote:I got a DF for "use of speed" on some country roads - not exceeding the speed limit, but apparently being a bit too progressive for the conditions.

:lol: It's pathetic isn't it? I suppose the only point might be if you drive like your hair's on fire (your normal driving style sir) it might be dangerous for a learner to attempt to emulate you esp. once they've passed their test and without your guidance.
crr003 wrote:And ECO is everywhere - I was told not to use more than 2.5k revs for accelerating through the gears for example.

Arrrggh! Bad advice - I certainly didn't restrict myself so much on P2 and passed with 2 minors.

Good luck with your retest...it's frustrating to have to fit into the DSA's view...you wait 'till P3!
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby vonhosen » Tue Nov 15, 2011 5:11 pm


michael769 wrote:My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.


The area that the stereotypical young male driver is poorly equipped is attitude stemming from the beliefs/values held.

The problem with traditional training is that it isn't equipped to address that problem (the problem is also evident in drivers from other demographics, not just reserved for young males) & it appears to me that the DSA both a) recognise that limitations in traditional methods more than & b) are rather more 'progressive' in promoting change to deal with those limitations, than the so called 'advanced driving' organisations.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

Postby crr003 » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:20 pm


martine wrote:
crr003 wrote:I got a DF for "use of speed" on some country roads - not exceeding the speed limit, but apparently being a bit too progressive for the conditions.

:lol: It's pathetic isn't it? I suppose the only point might be if you drive like your hair's on fire (your normal driving style sir) it might be dangerous for a learner to attempt to emulate you esp. once they've passed their test and without your guidance.

But that was the thing - it was bland but I thought I would show a little bit of "flair". Maybe if the standard was to teach getting round bends rather than just hoping you're slow enough on entry, there'd be less youth falling off roads post test. Annoying to think slowing it down a few mph would have made him happier. :cry:

martine wrote:Good luck with your retest...it's frustrating to have to fit into the DSA's view...you wait 'till P3!

Who said I failed? 8) (Oh - just realised - driving fault not dangerous fault :oops: )
crr003
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Wirral

Postby waremark » Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:52 pm


vonhosen wrote:
michael769 wrote:My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.


The area that the stereotypical young male driver is poorly equipped is attitude stemming from the beliefs/values held.

The problem with traditional training is that it isn't equipped to address that problem (the problem is also evident in drivers from other demographics, not just reserved for young males) & it appears to me that the DSA both a) recognise that limitations in traditional methods more than & b) are rather more 'progressive' in promoting change to deal with those limitations, than the so called 'advanced driving' organisations.

Please will you tell us more about DSA initiatives to address questions of attitude?

This may well be a lower priority for the advanced driving organisations, all of whose 'pupils' come of their own volition and because they wish to improve their driving skills.
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby ROG » Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:23 pm


waremark wrote:This may well be a lower priority for the advanced driving organisations, all of whose 'pupils' come of their own volition and because they wish to improve their driving skills.

I've never had an associate with a bad attitude .....yet

I have had 1 or 2 drivers on LGV DSA test courses with bad attitudes
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby fungus » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:08 pm


I have never had an associate with a bad attitude, but I have had the odd learner with an attitude problem.

It is very difficult to alter someones beliefs, as beliefs are formed by life experiences, and I would also imagine to a very large degree, by social and economic circumstances, and the environment they have been brought up in. This in itself makes it difficult for someone who has not experienced those conditions to fully understand the underlying problems that are causing the bad attitude.
Nigel ADI
IAM observer
User avatar
fungus
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Dorset

Postby vonhosen » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:46 pm


waremark wrote:
vonhosen wrote:
michael769 wrote:My concern is that such an attitude risks leaving the stereotypical young male driver very poorly equipped for the type of driving that some will choose to adopt post test. Perhaps this is part of why some new drivers have such an awful record.


The area that the stereotypical young male driver is poorly equipped is attitude stemming from the beliefs/values held.

The problem with traditional training is that it isn't equipped to address that problem (the problem is also evident in drivers from other demographics, not just reserved for young males) & it appears to me that the DSA both a) recognise that limitations in traditional methods more than & b) are rather more 'progressive' in promoting change to deal with those limitations, than the so called 'advanced driving' organisations.

Please will you tell us more about DSA initiatives to address questions of attitude?


Modernising training etc.
http://www.selkentadi.co.uk/wp-content/ ... ndoc-1.pdf

waremark wrote:This may well be a lower priority for the advanced driving organisations, all of whose 'pupils' come of their own volition and because they wish to improve their driving skills.


These drivers still have their emotions/beliefs/values underpinning their actions.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

Postby vonhosen » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:47 pm


ROG wrote:
waremark wrote:This may well be a lower priority for the advanced driving organisations, all of whose 'pupils' come of their own volition and because they wish to improve their driving skills.

I've never had an associate with a bad attitude .....yet


That isn't necessarily a good thing though.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

Postby waremark » Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:42 am


vonhosen wrote:
waremark wrote:Please will you tell us more about DSA initiatives to address questions of attitude?

Modernising training etc.
http://www.selkentadi.co.uk/wp-content/ ... ndoc-1.pdf

Thank you for the link. I was impressed by Trevor Wedge (before he was Chief Examiner) when he talked to my local IAM group about the introduction of the Hazard Perception Test. I was left extremely optimistic about the HPT, and have subsequently been extremely disappointed by the failure of the HPT and other changes over the last decade to reduce young driver accident involvement.

In relation to the linked report, I am left wondering both how strong the evidence is for the success rate of the 'Client Centred Learning' approach, and also how the mass of ADI's will be enabled to deliver this style of teaching effectively. As a Daily Mail reader, I am constantly being told that the educational standards of the state school system have been destroyed by implementation of similar approaches to teaching over the last few decades. I greatly hope that there is strong evidence that ADI's can be enabled to achieve better results than under more traditional teaching systems.

I am also entirely unclear what specific steps the DSA proposes which will do more than previously to create appropriate attitudes to risk and to other road users - that was what we were talking about here, and the topic was hardly addressed in the linked report.
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby waremark » Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:45 am


vonhosen wrote:
ROG wrote:
waremark wrote:This may well be a lower priority for the advanced driving organisations, all of whose 'pupils' come of their own volition and because they wish to improve their driving skills.

I've never had an associate with a bad attitude .....yet


That isn't necessarily a good thing though.

If you mean that the advanced driving organisations probably are not reaching the worst drivers, then of course that is not necessarily a good thing. However, the fact that they appeal to people who actually want to drive well is a valid reason why they do not need to put too much effort into addressing poor attitudes.
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby vonhosen » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:38 am


waremark wrote:
vonhosen wrote:
That isn't necessarily a good thing though.

If you mean that the advanced driving organisations probably are not reaching the worst drivers, then of course that is not necessarily a good thing. However, the fact that they appeal to people who actually want to drive well is a valid reason why they do not need to put too much effort into addressing poor attitudes.


People can display what they want you to see. In a telling environment that is even easier to do. To find out what people 'really' believe, what they truly 'value' & therefore what they'll actually do when away from you, then you have to create an environment that is not judgemental, get them to open up to you & ask rather than tell. You've heard of Johari's window haven't you ?

I've done it before. Gone to someone I want something from, done what they said in order to get it & not believed in it at all. The first time they asked what I thought & I told them, it was dismissed as incorrect because they believed something different. My beliefs didn't change because they told me they knew better, so my behaviour only changed in front of them & until I got what I wanted from them. A learning opportunity for both wasted & they are deluded in believing they've changed my mind. Because of that contact any future contact with them follows a similar pattern if I want something from them.

I see it all the time in others. Saying what they think you want to hear, rather than what they actually believe.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Chat Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests