Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:02 ami wouldn't trust Tiffany Dell giving a recommendation anyway
crr003 wrote:James wrote:The original 2.2 16V is nowhere near the car the Turbo version is.
"worms can a open of" arrange into a well known phrase or saying.......
Have you driven both? The NA boys will defend to the death that theirs handles better, if slower in a straight line.
Unless you're Tiff Needell it'll be hard to see much of a difference on the road, but I know you're into straight line speed from other postings, which the turbo would win at.
Never driven the 2.2, dont want to weither. Drove the turbo three times, the first time was when it first came out and I wasn't much of a driver. Almost lost it on a roundabout, road was wet and too much throttle going round it. Corrected it well though, then changed my underwear and continued.