A339 - why 50mph?

Forum for general chat, news, blogs, humour, jokes etc.

Postby martine » Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:41 am


Visited my brother in law on boxing day...went on the A339 from Newbury via Basingstoke and then towards Alton. Why is much of this otherwise excellent road limited to 50mph? In many places it had all the hallmarks of NSL but it's almost solid 50...aaarrrghh.
map here
Anyone know how long ago it was NSL or why it changed?
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby ROG » Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:23 pm


Easy answer - silly car drivers not able to drive safely at the higher speed limit - I've seen them on that road - many times.

The problem now is that good drivers are being penalised for the antics of others.
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby brianhaddon » Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:47 pm


It would not surprise me to find all NSL single carriageways to be reduced to 50 mph before too long (and some are going to 40mph). A similar thing is happening near where I live. The latest victim a perfectly good NSL road with clear views has been reduced to 50. It does have openings into fields but with such long and clear views it doesn't warrent a speed reduction. So I would like to know the real reason for these reductions and what is going through the minds of the planners when they come up with these ideas. What precisely is the process and motivation for these changes? Cue anyone with inside knowledge :wink:
brianhaddon
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: South Derbyshire

Postby TripleS » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:44 pm


Words fail me. :evil:

Best wishes all,
Dave.
TripleS
 
Posts: 6025
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Briggswath, Whitby

Postby jont » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:35 pm


Try driving in Derbyshire. Virtually every A or B road is 50 regardless of how good the sight lines and road surface are. Sadly as Brian says I think this will only become ever more prevalent.
User avatar
jont
 
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Postby waremark » Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:13 pm


The decisions are taken by politicians rather than by road safety professionals - accordingly the policy varies by county council. The irony is that you have to turn off the main roads onto the unclassifieds for your recreational motoring.
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby AnalogueAndy » Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:19 pm


brianhaddon wrote:So I would like to know the real reason for these reductions and what is going through the minds of the planners when they come up with these ideas. What precisely is the process and motivation for these changes? Cue anyone with inside knowledge :wink:


That'll be:DfT Circular 1/06

I've some inside knowledge as a Parish Clerk who has worked on a number of schemes with our local authority (Bath and North East Somerset) (and other 'partners' including the police)- you have me (and the Council) to thank for the 50/40 limit on the unclassified 'Lansdown Road' into Bath and the '30' and '20' limits on Broadmoor and Charlcombe Lanes in Bath.

As to motivation and criteria etc you need to read the whole thing - it's very difficult to summarise in a few words - unsurprisingly casualty reduction plays a big part. i.e. if a road has a bad accident record, speed redcution would become a consideration - paradoxically, we pushed for the aforementioned Lansdown Road '50' along with better signing, a right turn' island, repositioned Bus Stop etc and other measures on Lansdown Road but our scheme didn't get high enough up the priority list as the accident record wasn't bad enough. 18 months and 4 deaths later the scheme became no 3 on the priority list and got funding.
User avatar
AnalogueAndy
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:14 pm

Postby Horse » Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:45 pm


martine wrote:Visited my brother in law on boxing day...went on the A339 from Newbury via Basingstoke and then towards Alton. Why is much of this otherwise excellent road limited to 50mph? In many places it had all the hallmarks of NSL but it's almost solid 50...aaarrrghh.
map here
Anyone know how long ago it was NSL or why it changed?


I live a few yards from the 'top' end of it, and travelled back along from Alton late on Christmas Day.

Just a few miles N of Basingstoke there's a side turning on to a long single track road [towards Hannington] . . . which is NSL :(

Blanket 50s do get my goat - perhaps something for the 'lobbying IAM' thread?
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby ScoobyChris » Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:24 pm


Stumbled on this road a couple of months back after going for a drive with a friend and missing the turning we wanted. Quite surprised it was all 50mph as it seemed to be a good road with a nice smooth surface too :D

Chris
ScoobyChris
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:03 am
Location: Laaaaaaaaaahndan

Postby Mr Cholmondeley-Warner » Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:36 pm


It's a busy commuter route with heavy traffic in the mornings. I guess the 50 limit is possibly aimed at smoothing out traffic flow to some extent, as well as cutting down risky overtaking.
User avatar
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner
 
Posts: 2928
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Swindon, Wilts




Postby Big Err » Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:58 pm


AnalogueAndy wrote:DfT Circular 1/06


Probably the most woolly advice note in the world :roll:
User avatar
Big Err
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:30 pm
Location: Kinross, Scotland

Postby brianhaddon » Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:12 pm


Big Err wrote:
AnalogueAndy wrote:DfT Circular 1/06


Probably the most woolly advice note in the world :roll:


Shazbut - Eric got in before me!
I have just looked at it and would still ask the same questions I asked before.
What is worse with the example that I gave is if you go out of village in another direction the road is still NSL but it has a poor undulating surface and a narrow pavement adjacent to one side - and has a worse safety record to boot. For those who live in the area the first road is the B5008 from Repton as far as Newton Solney and the second example from Repton to Willington (all South Derbyshire).

I worry that too many examples will result in the following:

From DfT Circular 1/06
22. Indeed, if a speed limit is set in isolation, or is unrealistically low, it is likely to be
ineffective and lead to disrespect for the speed limit. As well as requiring significant, and
avoidable, enforcement costs, this may also result in substantial numbers of drivers
continuing to travel at unacceptable speeds, thus increasing the risk of collisions and
injuries.

Regards
Brian Haddon
brianhaddon
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: South Derbyshire

Postby vonhosen » Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:25 pm


I'd imagine that because a proportion of people are treating NSL as no speed limit, this is the result. They don't believe they'll be so inclined to treat a 50 as no speed limit.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

Postby brianhaddon » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:29 am


vonhosen wrote:I'd imagine that because a proportion of people are treating NSL as no speed limit, this is the result. They don't believe they'll be so inclined to treat a 50 as no speed limit.


This is one of the things that went through my mind. However the danger I see with this approach is that 50 will become the new 'NSL' and be ignored (but for different reasons). And as 50 is just another number other limits will receive the same contempt. I do not see this as a way to successfully get drivers to respect speed restrictions. The more you restrict people the more they will resist.

Regards
Brian Haddon
brianhaddon
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: South Derbyshire

Postby vonhosen » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:37 am


brianhaddon wrote:
vonhosen wrote:I'd imagine that because a proportion of people are treating NSL as no speed limit, this is the result. They don't believe they'll be so inclined to treat a 50 as no speed limit.


This is one of the things that went through my mind. However the danger I see with this approach is that 50 will become the new 'NSL' and be ignored (but for different reasons). And as 50 is just another number other limits will receive the same contempt. I do not see this as a way to successfully get drivers to respect speed restrictions. The more you restrict people the more they will resist.

Regards
Brian Haddon


And when people roundly ignore the 50's & treat them as no speed limit, it will give them the ammunition for ever more draconian measures.
Any views expressed are mine & mine alone.
I do not represent my employer or these forums.
vonhosen
 
Posts: 2624
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Behind you !

Next

Return to General Car Chat Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests