omegac wrote:Not that we were arguing about either of those topics
, but am I to take it then that there is not to be discussion here about the relative merits/standards of one organisation v another?
Sorry folks. I did not mean to quash discussion and I applaud folk who are
active members of both organisations. I would not want to side line organisations such as the HPC for cars and the BMF Blue Ribbon, Star Rider / Bike Safe, 2-wheeler groups.
I just get a bit anxious that the two major car organisations (IAM & RoADA) get played off against each other. As I have mentioned before in differing threads... some areas have population density to support both IAM & RoADA in other areas only one of them is seen to be successful.
I was just trying to introduce some facts to the debate in that I have been very fortunate to have experienced the IAM & RoADA around the UK. Whist all Advanced Driving groups might have the same aims they all believe they are better than the next one. There is nothing wrong with being confident - remember the 2nd Commandment...
Drive / Ride with deliberation and overtake as quickly as possible
Deliberation eliminates uncertainly. When safe, go!
Again the reality is I have seen & tested some PISH* On the other hand I have been fortunate enough to have ridden with a few (civilian) Advanced Riders who could have slipped on a Yellow Jacket and ridden a striped BMW and not have been told apart from my team. I can't give any higher praise than that. And the reality about these few... a couple had Advanced Driving certificate and a couple did not.
I know that the IAM & RoADA want to spread the word and have folk sit their tests, but I agree with Darren... its the taking part and improving which is important, not necessarily holding the bit of paper.
Just my thoughts.
Rennie
*
Please
Improve
Standards
Here