in a rush to get nowhere

Forum for general chat, news, blogs, humour, jokes etc.

Postby Jasp » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:40 pm


Someone tooted me today in the rush hour traffic. I can only assume the reason was I hadn't immediately darted forward to fill the space in front of me, or wasn't progressing rapidly to the rear bumper of the car in front.

I'll give you the situation. 2 mph max for the 1/2 mile at least. Clearly visible red traffic lights 100 yards ahead. Nowhere else the guy behind could turn off. He was going where I was going, for sure. I'm trying to regulate my speed to that of the output traffic so I never have to brake.

Was I wrong to try to minimise my accelerating and braking? Should you always fill spaces in front as rapidly as possible?

About five minutes later I was driving by the side of him. He looked quite annoyed he hadn't progressed that 10ft 2 seconds sooner.

I seem to get this a lot: people behind miffed at me slowing for stationary traffic ahead.

What say you?
User avatar
Jasp
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:32 am

Postby Red Herring » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:56 pm


I'd say ignore him. I'm all for crawling along in 1st rather then stop start. He would get bored eventually and either give up or overtake.
Red Herring
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:55 am

Postby Mr Cholmondeley-Warner » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:57 pm


It's quite common. He hasn't stopped and thought about the bigger picture, and maybe he drives the same route every day, so his frustration levels have crept up and up.

It can be very relaxing concentrating on matching speed with the lights etc. Unfortunately not everybody knows how to use that to advantage.
User avatar
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner
 
Posts: 2928
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Swindon, Wilts




Postby 7db » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:03 pm


I slowed up to the lights today, slowing in from 100 yrds, doing 40 dropping to stationary.
The bike in front of me tucked left to take lane one.

About 15 yards out, a car passed me and dived in in front of me to the red light. I needed a firm application of the brakes to avoid him.

He was slower off the lights than the bike. I had the joy of watching him DLAC for the next five miles as I pottered along behind him.
7db
 
Posts: 2724
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: London

Postby ROG » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:29 pm


This is part of my advice to drivers who are planning to get their first LGV licence -

The less obvious is to practise forward planning – the THINKING bit.

A good way of doing this is to use your brakes a lot less than what you do at present – sounds daft but think about it – to use the brakes less then you will have to ease off earlier – to ease off earlier you will have to plan ahead more.

I don’t mean by changing down through the gearbox either as that will waste fuel.

A good example would be when approaching a queue of standing traffic, which is waiting for traffic lights to change or waiting to enter a roundabout.
The moment you see the queue, check mirrors and ease off in the gear you are in. let the vehicle slow down on it’s own, dipping the clutch as necessary to control any possible stalling. If the vehicle gets to the lowest gear speed (usually first gear) then engage that gear.
If, whilst easing off, you anticipate that the traffic is going to proceed, then engage the gear that will take you with them without rushing up to the rear of the queue.
You will be leaving a large area of tarmac in front of your vehicle when you ease off early. If another vehicle goes into the gap then re-adjust to accommodate it. If you curse at the vehicle that went into your forward space then decide if a few feet of tarmac is worth getting stressed over!!
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby fungus » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:41 pm


I tend to let the speed drop off gradually on approach to stationary traffic, or traffic lights, with the intention to keep moving if possible. It does seem to annoy some drivers, although most don't seem to mind.

Nigel ADI
IAM trainee observer
User avatar
fungus
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Dorset

Postby Jasp » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:00 pm


I wish more LGV drivers were like you ROG.

I do notice the good ones (there are some!) and it is quite refreshing when I have to think 'there's a lorry behind me, and he isn't right up my arse'
User avatar
Jasp
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:32 am

Postby ROG » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:56 am


fungus wrote:I tend to let the speed drop off gradually on approach to stationary traffic, or traffic lights, with the intention to keep moving if possible. It does seem to annoy some drivers, although most don't seem to mind.

Nigel ADI
IAM trainee observer


I find it usually irks them for a while and then, when they realise that what is happening and we do not stop, I can often see a smile in the rear view..........
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby ROG » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:59 am


Jasp wrote:I wish more LGV drivers were like you ROG.

I do notice the good ones (there are some!) and it is quite refreshing when I have to think 'there's a lorry behind me, and he isn't right up my arse'


I would go further than that and say most I meet are good LGV drivers - like most things, we tend to notice the dorks more.
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby Red Herring » Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:42 am


That could be a bit like us saying most of the drivers we meet are good drivers, unless you hang out at Halfords as well as ADUK days....Birds of a feather flock together?
Red Herring
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:55 am

Postby michael769 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:08 am


Jasp wrote:Someone tooted me today in the rush hour traffic. I can only assume the reason was I hadn't immediately darted forward to fill the space in front of me, or wasn't progressing rapidly to the rear bumper of the car in front.

What say you?


Are you sure that he was actually tooting at you?

Could he have been tooting at a friend he had just seen pass by? Or perhaps he though he knew you? Could he have hit the horn by mistake? Could it have actually been a completely different vehicle in the vicinity that tooted?

Don't get me wrong I suspect that you are probably correct in your initial assumption, but I would suggest that it is just an assumption and like all assumptions it may not be correct....
Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open
Thomas Robert Dewar(1864-1930)
michael769
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Livingston

Postby 7db » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:13 am


Jasp wrote:I wish more LGV drivers were like you ROG.


True -- nice when they let you nip in front of them at the lights...
7db
 
Posts: 2724
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: London

Postby TripleS » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:48 am


Jasp wrote:I wish more LGV drivers were like you ROG.


I wish more road users - whoever they are - applied more of the thinking that ROG sets out above.

Best wishes all,
Dave.
TripleS
 
Posts: 6025
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Briggswath, Whitby

Postby AnalogueAndy » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:46 pm


Jasp wrote:Someone tooted me today in the rush hour traffic.

I seem to get this a lot: people behind miffed at me slowing for stationary traffic ahead.

What say you?


I'd like to say I don't react to challenges but I often give them a cheery wave and a smile in response :lol:
User avatar
AnalogueAndy
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:14 pm

Postby Horse » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:00 pm


Jasp wrote: I can only assume the reason was I hadn't immediately darted forward to fill the space in front of me, or wasn't progressing rapidly to the rear bumper of the car in front.


Last friday afternoon I was in a three-lane jam on the M4. Nice Ferrari almost alongside, and as the lanes were all speeding and slowing at different rates I saw it several times (also because he had a reason for chopping lanes, getting across to L1 early ready for the exit slip queue, unlike some of the f@ckw1ts who thought they'd gain something by chopping and diving . . . ).

Aaaanyway . . .

He was hanging well back from the vehicle in front - often about 100 metres - then flooring it!

I saw him do it 3 times. Sounded luvverly :D

Jasp wrote: I seem to get this a lot: people behind miffed at me slowing for stationary traffic ahead.


The Filly followed me in her car recently, and commented about how early I slowed - ratehr than brake - for bends etc. and said that although she knew 'why' most drivers wouldn't.
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Next

Return to General Car Chat Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests