7db wrote:I see a lot of cars not stopping when they could on amber and the first second of red. Very few beyond that.
jont wrote:GJD wrote:The traffic was very light from all directions and I think they were more likely on their mobile phone not paying attention to the lights at all.
/efa
gannet wrote: especially as a cyclist myself - I see so many doing it make me mad. Especially when loads do so without a helmet
Horse wrote:gannet wrote: especially as a cyclist myself - I see so many doing it make me mad. Especially when loads do so without a helmet
Interesting twist on that: there's a suggestion that, in London, female cyclists are more likely to obey the red lights - and as a consequence more likely to get squished by left-turning HGVs.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 695668.ece
AAMOI, how much difference do you think a helmet makes?
gannet wrote:I see more and more cycle lanes popping up all over the place - all down the left hand side of the road. A good idea in principle - but should a cyclist going past stationary traffic use the cycle lane or go down the right hand side of the lane of traffic? As a cyclist I always feel safer going down the right hand side... be interested in any thoughts?
Helmets... you can never predict how you may fall and what you might hit. I'd rather have one than not. I remember as a kid rebelling against wearing one when they first hit the news etc. My parents basically said wear one or don't cycle so I wore one. I then came off down to my own stupidity, headbutted the ground and then the bike landed on my head all without injury - would have been a different story without the helmet...
MGF wrote:Is jumping a red light necessarily any worse than breaking the speed limit? Or is it down to the individual circumstances?
GJD wrote:I don't think the solution to unnecessary red lights is as easy or obvious as the solution to unnecessarily low speed limits.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests