Second fatality within a month.

Forum for general chat, news, blogs, humour, jokes etc.

Postby sussex2 » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:23 am


Interesting.
My father was one of the founders of CHIRP (Confidential human factors incident reporting) a system whereby pilots could report incidents anonymously).
Over years access to the reports would have helped a lot of people in the aviation business.
I'm not bothered about the old Romanians and Bulgarians but the Old Etonians scare me rigid.
sussex2
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:01 am

Postby Horse » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:19 am


michael769 wrote:
trashbat wrote:I bet others on here are better informed, but I think the roads folk do have 3D scene image capture, and parties such as vehicle manufacturers (at least in some countries) do show an active investigative interest in fatal accidents involving their vehicles.


I believe Volvo has a team in Sweden that goes out to accidents.


There are two DfT funded teams in the UK.
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby martine » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:18 pm


trashbat wrote:A fatal plane crash is hundreds of lives in one moment, mostly people who were owed (and paid for) a duty of care, often avoidable with just one correction. There's also a lot of money in it - cost and liability. On the roads, although they quickly add up to many more, each car crash is just a few people in isolation, in varied and complex circumstances, and the apparent cash at stake is low.

No most air accidents involve no loss of life at all - they are still investigated and recommendations made. A further chunk involve crashes where most people survive - it's a common misconception that once something goes wrong in an aircraft (or piloting) then all the occupants are doomed. The majority of air crashes are primarily due to pilot error - much like RTCs.

There are differences of course between air and road 'incidents' and the way the attitude and system works...I am suggesting we should make RTC investigation more like air - why not?
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby martine » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:21 pm


Big Err wrote:The other large diffeence between the two forms of investigations is that most(?) Air Accidents involve Professionals through out - Pilots, Air Traffic Control, Maintenance Teams etc. Each one has clearly defined roles, rules to adhere to and responsibilities. Meanwhile the roads are full of Amateurs (many of us included).

I'm not sure that's true actually...I wouldn't be surprised if most were with non-professional pilots at the controls but I don't have the figures to hand. Anyone?
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby trashbat » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:24 pm


martine wrote:No most air accidents involve no loss of life at all - they are still investigated and recommendations made. A further chunk involve crashes where most people survive - it's a common misconception that once something goes wrong in an aircraft (or piloting) then all the occupants are doomed. The majority of air crashes are primarily due to pilot error - much like RTCs.

There are differences of course between air and road 'incidents' and the way the attitude and system works...I am suggesting we should make RTC investigation more like air - why not?

Hence 'fatal plane crash'. The piece you quoted was about there being more at stake in any one instance of things going wrong.
Rob - IAM F1RST, Alfa Romeo 156 JTS
trashbat
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:11 pm
Location: Hampshire

Postby trashbat » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:26 pm


martine wrote:
Big Err wrote:The other large diffeence between the two forms of investigations is that most(?) Air Accidents involve Professionals through out - Pilots, Air Traffic Control, Maintenance Teams etc. Each one has clearly defined roles, rules to adhere to and responsibilities. Meanwhile the roads are full of Amateurs (many of us included).

I'm not sure that's true actually...I wouldn't be surprised if most were with non-professional pilots at the controls but I don't have the figures to hand. Anyone?


https://www.ntsb.gov/data/aviation_stats.html

Obviously some GA flights will be by ATPL holders etc, but probably the vast majority aren't.
Rob - IAM F1RST, Alfa Romeo 156 JTS
trashbat
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:11 pm
Location: Hampshire

Postby martine » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:27 pm


sussex2 wrote:Interesting.
My father was one of the founders of CHIRP (Confidential human factors incident reporting) a system whereby pilots could report incidents anonymously).
Over years access to the reports would have helped a lot of people in the aviation business.

Yes and a fine system that is too. It probably only really comes into play when a professional pilot is under pressure by their employer to do something illegal or bad practice. I'm not sure that applies to most RTCs - lorries/buses excepted.
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby Ancient » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:05 am


martine wrote:
sussex2 wrote:Interesting.
My father was one of the founders of CHIRP (Confidential human factors incident reporting) a system whereby pilots could report incidents anonymously).
Over years access to the reports would have helped a lot of people in the aviation business.

Yes and a fine system that is too. It probably only really comes into play when a professional pilot is under pressure by their employer to do something illegal or bad practice. I'm not sure that applies to most RTCs - lorries/buses excepted.

Fatigue factor for travelling consultants/sales? Pressure to make too many visits per week or not to incur the costs of staying over? Personally I think this could be a cause of many car incidents. My father drove all over southern England managing departments for a large supermarket and frequently left at 5am to return after 11pm.
What are the rules on combined office work and driving? How many keep to them (or even know them)?
Ancient
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:22 pm

Postby martine » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:22 am


Ancient wrote:What are the rules on combined office work and driving? How many keep to them (or even know them)?

There are no official rules for car drivers...but you could well be right...about 400 fatalaties per year are people driving for work yet the HSE seem to make more noise about building site risks.
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby michael769 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:24 am


Ancient wrote:What are the rules on combined office work and driving? How many keep to them (or even know them)?


There are no formal rules for non-commercial (ie not required to have a tachograph) vehicles.

For commercials office work would have to be recorded as "other work" and be subject to the relevant restrictions on rest periods.
Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open
Thomas Robert Dewar(1864-1930)
michael769
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Livingston

Postby triquet » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:32 am


martine wrote:
Ancient wrote:What are the rules on combined office work and driving? How many keep to them (or even know them)?

There are no official rules for car drivers...but you could well be right...about 400 fatalaties per year are people driving for work yet the HSE seem to make more noise about building site risks.


Mmm. One might conjecture that driver fatigue might figure rather high in this ...
Jim
Offshore Engineer and Master of Music
triquet
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:51 pm

Postby MGF » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:32 am


The offical rules can be found in the Health and Safety at Work Act and the Management of Safety at Work Regulations. No prescribed hours but an employer must assess and reduce risk.

Plenty of info. here.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg382.pdf
MGF
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Postby michael769 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:44 am


triquet wrote:
Mmm. One might conjecture that driver fatigue might figure rather high in this ...


Probably also a degree of time pressure....
Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open
Thomas Robert Dewar(1864-1930)
michael769
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Livingston

Postby triquet » Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:21 am


michael769 wrote:
triquet wrote:
Mmm. One might conjecture that driver fatigue might figure rather high in this ...


Probably also a degree of time pressure....


I suspect also it is highly dependent on time of day. On the Oxfordshire A34 you see some very interesting "progress" being made at 6:00 am and 19:00 - 20:00 in the evening as the "area managers" boot around in their Audis and Beemers ... :mrgreen:
Jim
Offshore Engineer and Master of Music
triquet
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:51 pm

Postby Horse » Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:11 pm


martine wrote: No most air accidents involve no loss of life at all


I had a trainee who dropped into conversation: "I've never crashed a bike - crashed a plane though"
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Chat Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests