Zebedee wrote:I should think the police accident investigators are well aware of the impact of trauma on people's recall. Surely this sort of this is covered when an officer's trained in accident investigation?
Also, the driver pleaded guilty in this case.
I have no idea what they're trained in or not but a guilty plea doesn't necessarily denote guilt and from what i've read about this case, it has been taken to mean that the driver doesn't recall seeing either the bike or the car coming towards them, which in turn doesn't necessarily mean they didn't see them but that they don't recall seeing them. That's what i'm curious about.
I just wonder how the drivers recall was tested to the point of certainty, even when a guilty plea was entered. How could they
not have seen either the oncoming car, the bike or both from the position they were in? It's how they interpreted that information that matters and why they can't recall it.