Page 2 of 2

Re: Your interpretation?!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:19 am
by revian
exportmanuk wrote:
revian wrote:It's a test for 'advanced drivers maths'. Fits in the matrix...

The answer is....30 x 60=180mph... Unless it's one half of a dual carriageway... In which case a reasonable 210mph limit..surely that's arguable in court?


Advanced driver but not advanced maths

I thought 30 x 60 was 1800 mph :?:

Just a little faster than Concord could fly at :D

Late night dumbness on my part... Or, being a vague LFC supporter,I divide all expectations by 10 :oops:

Re: Your interpretation?!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:51 pm
by WhoseGeneration
Ooh, great, external pacenotes, bit of a mix of race and rally but it's a start.
To the right a 100 countdown board, odd postion though and looks a bit too close.
To the left bend angle description, no indication of left or right unfortunately.
8)

Re: Your interpretation?!

PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:46 pm
by Kimosabe
I read the OP as 'anything goes because nobody is looking'. Am I a bad person?