Hi, at the risk of upsetting your instructor I need to ask a couple of questions.
If the ambulance was on an emergency callout and approaching the roundabout, why did your instructor tell you to go?
Why are you unsure if it was a dual carriegeway, did your instructor not explain if it was or not?
Am I alone on here wondering about your instructor?
As to the theory most of the questions have iether a "common sense" answer or a "logical" answer.
Take it a section at a time and you will fine, dont cram too much into the brain at once.
Ivor
Hmm, I'm not sure.
It's the same roundabout I saw the police car at last time although I was at a different angle.
Basically it's not your normal crossroad-looking roundabout. When I approach it from my home, you can go directly straight (and not even touching the roundabout, because the roundabout will be to the right), or you can join the roundabout to take the next exit. I was supposed to go straght ahead (hence not even touching the roundabout) but I could see an ambulance to the right and I thought by the time I get ready to go it will probably catch up. I honestly don't know why I was told to go, it's not like anyone else was really movnh.
Lol I wasn't told it was a dual carriageway but she told me it's the North Circular and when I came home I told my dad who told me it was a dual carriageway. I only stayed to the left but maybe the rain (there was a lot of it) made the instructor not tell me that and focus on where I am going. To me it looks like a smaller version of a motorway which I have been on plenty of times with family but yeah, if she was meant to tell me it was a dual carriageway then I have no idea why she didn't.
Thanks for your advice about the theory. I am being lazy in revising because I am not used to revising (the type of person who revises last minute and does okay) but I know I can't risk that when it comes to driving. I think I knew more about cars and the road when I was a kid than now. Most of it seems okay though but it's a few questions which you don't face on a day to day basis as a learner driver which catch me out but I've noticed when go back to it the second time I usually know the answer because of making the mistake the first time. There are still a few sections I need to tackle though.
fungus wrote:I would tend to agree with those sentiments Ivor.
driving2day, whilst it is understandable that you want to get your theory out of the way, there really is no point in rushing into it, especially if you are still a fair way off being ready for your practical test. I advise my pupils not to take their theory test untill they are consistantly scoring 46 out of 50.
A dual carriageway must have a physical barrier seperating the two carriageways, ie. kerbing, a crash barrier, or a bank running between the two etc. A white line painted on the road, even if there are two lanes on either side, would not constitute a dual carriageway.
Yep, there was a barrier and about 3 or 4 lanes each side, I'll try to google it and show you if I can.
Gareth wrote:It's probably a matter of perspective, in this case that of driving on busy London roads where other motorists are possibly more impatient than in other areas of the UK. If the instructor thought there was plenty of time to continue onto the roundabout without inconveniencing the ambulance driver, then it's understandable. Learners tend to be hesitant to begin with, and it takes time to develop the judgement to know whether to set off or to wait, so the instructor will be trying to provide practical experience by telling the learner what they should do in uncertain situations. However, if the learner is still unsure, waiting is clearly the safer option.
I always assumed when you hear a ambulance or police car (especially an ambulance) or something similar, then if you can see it in your view and either it's right behind or coming your way (not on normal roads but things like roundabouts which are sort-of one way), then you should wait till it passes. I was hesitant because I didn't see anyone from my side moving. The ambulance could have either gone to the right of me towards my home, or carried on going round and then gong ahead, the way we were going, and I didn't want to get in the way because no one else was moving. Hence the stall because I didn't want to be put in the same situation as last time where we were blocking the car. An ambulance could be more important. I suppose next time I should give it a go and not hesitate.
IVORTHE DRIVER wrote:Ok Gareth I can see your point but surely to almost encourage a driver to pull out despite the ambulance, is only encouraging the same impatience in the learner.
I think and I know I am not an instructor, it could have been better to waited until the pupil knew where the vehicle was going, more valuable experience to be gained that way surely.
Ivor
I agree with this a little more. I am not the impatient type when it comes to waiting because when driving safety comes first, and in this case, possibly someone's life (the ambulance came from the direction of the hospital which is off the roundabout).
I knew the ambulance would either take its next left (towards my home) or go in the direction I was going, and had I gone onto the roundabout, the ambulance would have caught up as they do drive fast and it's not like a normal car. Confusing more than anything.
I have had 14 lessons with her now and yesterday I went on that same dual carriageway (looked on google but for some reason it doesn't look like what I went on) and this time went to 50mph.On Thursday I was a little afraid to go higher than about 42mph but yesterday I went up to 50mph and it was fine. I said to my instructor it felt slower than driving 40mph on normal roads (which I don't like doing because I fear someone will cross the road suddenly or something) and she told me it was because the roads were wider.
Other than that I continued on one way roads. I think the purpose of this was so I continue practising routine - mirros, signal, slow down, position, gear etc. I noticed the instructor telling me to slow down, change to 2nd gear and give a little gas when going over road bumps which go from one pavement to the other (not the ones that are like square blocks and in sets of three). I read this in the theory book too and although I don't completely understand why, I suppose it's for the safety of the schools which surround it.
I also did reverse round sharp bend which went okay.
At the end of the lesson my instructor mentioned it was the 14th lesson to which I said, almost 20 (by the looks of the card where the appointments are written because I have booked 3 for next week). She said to me hopefully I will be more than half way there. Not sure how much though.
I'm in a bit if a pickly though. I feel I have control over the car but I probably need to brush up on everything I have learnt so far which will take some time but I'm not sure if I should then go to the AA instructor after 20 lessons. She seemed okay but should I continue withmy instructor? I know people might say changing instructors is a bad idea as they will teach different things but they were the same when it came to the basics.