Is advanced driving just a matter of training?

Discussion on Advanced and Defensive Driving.

Postby Mr Cholmondeley-Warner » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:13 pm


Burn him!!! :twisted:

:mrgreen:
User avatar
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner
 
Posts: 2928
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Swindon, Wilts




Postby Horse » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:14 pm


So how do we decide 'advanced'?
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby ScoobyChris » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:42 pm


IVORTHE DRIVER wrote:as long as you are able to recognise your limits, the cars limits and the limits of the rules you can teach yourself up to a very high standard.


But which standard? :D

Chris
ScoobyChris
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:03 am
Location: Laaaaaaaaaahndan

Postby ScoobyChris » Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:56 pm


Horse wrote:So how do we decide 'advanced'?


How about a test? ;)

Chris
ScoobyChris
 
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:03 am
Location: Laaaaaaaaaahndan

Postby ROG » Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:42 pm


playtent wrote:How many hours on average would someone require to pass an advanced driving test with IAM or similar?
I know you will say that the person needs to practice in between, but time with an observer?
10?

Regards

On average out of 100 associates I did 5 or 6 hours with each
ROG (retired)
Civilian Advanced Driver
Observer - Leicester Group of Advanced Motorists
EX LGV instructor
User avatar
ROG
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: LEICESTER

Postby Mr Cholmondeley-Warner » Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:05 pm


@ROG, conversely I've done about 17 with my current one and he's a little way off yet ;)
User avatar
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner
 
Posts: 2928
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Swindon, Wilts




Postby dth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:54 pm


Horse wrote:So how do we decide 'advanced'?


An agreed definition of advanced driving by IAM, RoSPA and DSA:

"Advanced driving is the ability to control the position and speed of the vehicle safely, systematically and smoothly, using road and traffic conditions to progress unobtrusively with skill and responsibility.

This skill requires a positive but courteous attitude and a high standard of driving competence based on concentration, effective all round observation, anticipation, and planning. This must be co-ordinated with good handling skills.

The vehicle should be at the right place on the road at the right time, travelling at the right speed with the correct gear engaged and can always be stopped safely on its own side of the road in the distance that can be seen to be clear.."


Why not just call it better driving?
Life is not black and white - neither is driving.
dth
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:43 pm

Postby Horse » Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:57 pm


ScoobyChris wrote:
Horse wrote:So how do we decide 'advanced'?


How about a test? ;)


That'd work - what test criteria and marking standards? Give us a list . . .
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby Horse » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:00 pm


Mr Cholmondeley-Warner wrote:@ROG, conversely I've done about 17 with my current one and he's a little way off yet ;)


Typically, a rider's 'CBT' - compulsory basic training, which validates a provisional licence motorcycle entitlement - is taken and completed within a single day, including two hours on-road riding after off-road machine control exercises and some theory.

I had one trainee who took most of nine months of two hours most Sunday mornings . . .
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby Kevin » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:02 pm


dth wrote:Why not just call it better driving?


Because a bad driver's performance might become 'better' without actually becoming 'advanced'.
Kevin
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:32 pm
Location: Thetford

Postby jont » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:11 pm


Horse wrote:I had one trainee who took most of nine months of two hours most Sunday mornings . . .

Do you think there's a point where someone should be told they are never going to reach a safe standard and should be stopped from making any further attempts? (ie just to stop the process of resitting until you fluke a pass)?
User avatar
jont
 
Posts: 2990
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Postby TiJay » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:21 pm


Indeed. Which is why there should be a limit on the amount of any driving test you can take in a period of x years. But (*puts cynical hat on*), candidates who fail repeatedly are paying good money to do so. It'd be a hell of a way for the DSA to limit their income if they refused to test people after x attempts.
Passed driving test: Feb 2007 (2nd time)
Passed IAM test: July 2008 (first time!)

Car: Mazda MX-5 Mk1
TiJay
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:31 pm

Postby dth » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:40 pm


Kevin wrote:
dth wrote:Why not just call it better driving?


Because a bad driver's performance might become 'better' without actually becoming 'advanced'.


True but improvement should be the goal.
Life is not black and white - neither is driving.
dth
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:43 pm

Postby Russ_H » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:54 pm


TiJay wrote:Indeed. Which is why there should be a limit on the amount of any driving test you can take in a period of x years. But (*puts cynical hat on*), candidates who fail repeatedly are paying good money to do so. It'd be a hell of a way for the DSA to limit their income if they refused to test people after x attempts.


Those wishing to qualify as ADIs only have three attempts at Part 2, and three attempts
at Part 3, within two years of passing their Part 1, the theory test. This was to prevent
people from passing merely by familiarity.

I conducted many of these tests when I worked for DSA. I don't have exact figures available,
but I would say that most candidates, but not all, passed the Part 2 within three attempts, but
many people failed the Part 3 three times, or ran out of time. Some people served their two
years in the wilderness and then started the process again.

One chap - obviously I'm not going to mention names or places - used to bring his candidates
to a test centre where I did some L tests. I discovered that he had passed his Part 3 on the
second attempt of his third cycle through the system. That, I think, would be his eighth attempt.
He wasn't much good, to judge by the performance of his pupils. He left that job, and went to
work for a driving instructor training organisation
Russ_H
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:54 pm

Postby martine » Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:25 pm


Russ_H wrote:...but many people failed the Part 3 three times, or ran out of time.

I passed my ADI part 3 on my 3rd attempt :oops: and I have to say I found it the most difficult thing I've done (including learning to fly (PPL) when I was 18). Personally I think the current part 3 is very false and with the 30% pass rate nationally there is something wrong somewhere.
<Sour Grapes Mode=off>
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Driving Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


cron