Some good posts and plenty to think about. There are a few different view points here and I think there's perhaps no right answer but a few each with their own pros/cons.
I like the idea of treating each car as its own overtake and considering at what point you become committed, then looking for any hazards that would affect each overtake in turn. I don't think it will always be that simple on some of the more congested roads but it seems a good idea.
Ancient wrote:A two-lane dual carriageway and there isn't room to brake to the speed of the lane you are overtaking? Why not? What was your escape plan if a vehicle in that lane had an attack of impatience?
IMO if you could not stop your overtaking manoevre safely at the time you saw the slow-moving vehicle at the front of the overtaken queue, then your speed differential was too large.
I was capable of stopping when I saw the cyclist if the leading vehicle had moved out - that's why I initially started to brake in case this happened. When I saw their brake lights then I took that to mean they had seen me (otherwise they would have pulled out) and that they were slowing for the cyclist. There is no point in us both braking together which is why I went back on the power, and that's why I originally raised the question.