Gareth wrote:If there is an obstruction in the road such that traffic can only flow in one direction at a time, and if there is a bit of a gap ahead and I can see a long queue on the other side, I generally won't rush to join the tail. On the other hand I am very assertive about plonking myself into the first available on-coming gap, then going slowly until I see I have the co-operation of the next on-coming vehicle.
Does you approach differ much depending on which side of the road the obstruction is on?
Gareth wrote:Pretty much that's it. I generally don't slow down to allow others to join the main flow of traffic, but neither do I speed up to block them from doing so if they feel they are able to accelerate quickly enough, (and I strongly hope they aren't going to hang about if they are cheekily joining).
I don't think I slow down to allow others to join either, but I might deliberately accelerate a little more gently to allow a gap that has begun to appear ahead of me to develop into one big enough to allow someone to join.
The only situation that comes to mind where I am sometimes tempted to slow is when I'm in a moving queue with no sign of a natural break behind me and an oncomer waiting to turn right across my path is blocking the oncoming lane, causing a stationary queue to build behind them. In that situation, while I accept that easing off early to create a gap for them to cross my path amounts to a deliberate decision on my part to reverse the rules of priority, it can feel like causing a brief, minor inconvenience to those behind me (for a short time I would cause them to have to travel slightly slower than they otherwise could) might not be unreasonable in order to relieve the more major inconvenience (being blocked from moving at all) being suffered by those stuck behind the oncomer who is waiting to turn.
If I'm turning left into the same road as the oncomer is turning right, I'd probably give serious though to timing my approach so as give the oncomer room to turn in front of me.