IAM Masters v RoSPA

Discussion on Advanced and Defensive Driving.

Postby jcochrane » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:08 pm


We'll done Graham on the Distinction. I would agree wth your comparison assessment.
jcochrane
 
Posts: 1877
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: East Surrey and wherever good driving roads can be found.

Postby fungus » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:23 pm


Well done Graham.
Nigel ADI
IAM observer
User avatar
fungus
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Dorset

Postby martine » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:49 pm


sussex2 wrote:Indeed but I wonder if there comes a time to cease taken examinations and rely on the knowledge you have accrued; and keeping up to date by reading.

Ahh yes I see what you mean...cease taking tests may be - but continued self-analysis and coaching from others should perhaps be never-ending.
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby Horse » Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:06 pm


martine wrote:
sussex2 wrote:Indeed but I wonder if there comes a time to cease taken examinations and rely on the knowledge you have accrued; and keeping up to date by reading.

Ahh yes I see what you mean...cease taking tests may be - but continued self-analysis and coaching from others should perhaps be never-ending.


While sat in a queue on the M4 this morning, I was wondering who maintains the standards of the HPC gatekeepers, and what process is in place to select and train their replacements?

[Being cheery (it's my job to be a professional pessimist), if both gatekeepers are out for a drive, and a plane crashes on them, who will take over?]

Image
On the M27

Image
Yes, that's a Transit van, on the A40
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby JamesAllport » Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:12 pm


Horse wrote: While sat in a queue on the M4 this morning, I was wondering who maintains the standards of the HPC gatekeepers, and what process is in place to select and train their replacements?


This is in no way an official HPC answer, but I think it goes as follows...

Both Clive & Andy (the current gatekeepers) were well known to the Club before they became gatekeepers. HPC members had been driving with them on events, and going to them for coaching, formally and informally, for about a decade before they became gatekeepers. So they were a natural fit in that they combined a deep and current expertise with a good feel for the culture, style, values and standards of the Club. Both are recognised by peers in the police driving instructor community as being right at the top of their game, as drivers and coaches. And they had demonstrated consistently that they could apply that police expertise to coach civillians in some very diverse cars, whose objectives are very different to police training.

Both still coach part-time at police driving schools at advanced and instructor level. I think Andy still trains instructors for cars and bikes, and benchmarks other instructor-trainers on bikes. I know Clive still trains new car instructors and I think he also does occasional bike courses. So I imagine that keeps them pretty sharp.

James
Only two things matter: attitude & entry speeds.
JamesAllport
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Chichester, West Sussex




Postby revian » Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:02 pm


I try not to do envy :roll: .... Well done Graham!

Ian
Wirral
revian
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:37 pm

Postby daz6215 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:24 pm


So what is the difference between RoSPA Gold and the Masters? What makes it a higher standard? Could you contrast the two of them please?
daz6215
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:50 am

Postby waremark » Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:53 am


JamesAllport wrote:
Horse wrote: While sat in a queue on the M4 this morning, I was wondering who maintains the standards of the HPC gatekeepers, and what process is in place to select and train their replacements?


This is in no way an official HPC answer, but I think it goes as follows...


James

I offer a complementary non official HPC answer. The club has a standards committee of very experienced members well respected by other members. It would be the responsibility of this committee. These experienced and respected members and other similarly respected members regularly drive both with the gatekeepers and with newly admitted members. Future gatekeepers would be likely already to be well known to club members. These sorts of processes which are powerful and effective are practical in an organization the size of HPC but would not be suitable in an organization the size of the IAM.
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby martine » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:00 am


daz6215 wrote:So what is the difference between RoSPA Gold and the Masters? What makes it a higher standard? Could you contrast the two of them please?

My understanding is the expectation of Masters drive is higher and the marking less forgiving of even the smallest error or omission. I lost marks for missing 1 overtake. The drive is 90 mins and commentary is expected for most of it. There are Roadcraft and detailed Highway Code questions. You are expected to have excellent knowledge of your vehicle, comprehensive POWDEREY (yes I thought it was POWDERY too), Cockpit and Shutdown drills and show immaculate implementation of 'The System' with greatly extended observation and excellent anticipation.

To put my comments in perspective I've done Masters but not taken ROSPA. Our IAM Staff examiner examines both and he is quite clear that a good Masters mark is above what would gain ROSPA Gold.
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby jcochrane » Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:47 am


An examiner for both bodies described the standard of Masters as a drive he would expect to see from an advanced police driver without exceeding speed limits. As martine has said any fault seen, even if only once, results in a deduction in the marking.
jcochrane
 
Posts: 1877
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: East Surrey and wherever good driving roads can be found.

Postby waremark » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:49 am


Save me looking it up. What changes POWDER to POWDEREY?
waremark
 
Posts: 2440
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:18 pm

Postby martine » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:15 am


waremark wrote:Save me looking it up. What changes POWDER to POWDEREY?

Petrol
Oil
Water
Damage
Electrics
Rubber
Environment (as in road, traffic, weather)
Yourself (as in tired, emotional, alchohol, drugs - prescription or 'recreational')
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




Postby graham25 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 7:43 am


My thanks to all who posted a reply to original comment on the IAM Masters V RoSPA Gold. I think Maritine from Bristol has the answer to this when he says that the scoring on the Masters test is less forgiving than other tests in that the slightest deviation from a top level drive can affect your score. Here are some examples that could lower your score:

A missed opportunity to overtake.
Taking up the following position when it should have been the contact position ready for an overtake.
Slight hesitation to move out of a roundabout (most 'normal' people wouldn't notice this)
Not taking the lane of least resistance on a dual carriageway/motorway.
Failing to adjust vehicle position in lane (place of safety) with an HGV coming towards in opposite direction.

Inadequate commentary. I opted to use the driving commentary for most of the drive but even for the most experienced advanced driver a high level commentary for nearly two hours is very demanding. It's all about practise, practise, and more practise. It must flow without any fumbling around for the right words. In a congested area it is essential that you call the priorities and then hope the examiner agrees with your selection.

Someone asked me who my examiner was but I'm not sure I should give this info in open forum. If anyone would like to know this or exchange more info on the test please feel free to PM me.

Although I got a good result (distinction) I'll leave you with a couple of things that happened to me on test which if they hadn't happened may well have increased my score. I was on a single carriage way driving at 60mph, the windscreen was covered in spray so I pressed my windscreen washer to clear the screen. The examiner commented that I could have chosen a safer place to do it and waited for a gap in the opposing traffic rather than doing it with an HGV coming towards in the opposite direction. Fair comment I suppose but how many of us would consider this? May be you would but I didn't?

I was on a country road and in full commentary and noticed a parked car which I called and then added that there is no footway so I'm looking for pedestrians. The examiner said 'anything else' and then suggested I should also be looking specifically for dog walkers from the parked car. Again fair comment and an example of where the commentary must cover everything.

I could go on but I'll leave it there.
[size=85]Graham
Training Officer and RoADAR Advanced Tutor - Northants RoADAR
IAM National Observer
IAM Masters Distinction
IAM Masters Mentor
graham25
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:12 pm

Postby Horse » Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:14 am


graham25 wrote: I was on a single carriage way driving at 60mph, the windscreen was covered in spray so I pressed my windscreen washer to clear the screen. The examiner commented that I could have chosen a safer place to do it and waited for a gap in the opposing traffic rather than doing it with an HGV coming towards in the opposite direction.


I often put the wipers on before encountering an oncoming HGV (or on the bike, duck behind the screen) if I reasonably expect additional spray in its wake.
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby martine » Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:41 am


Crikey Graham your 2 examples do seem to be very detailed criticisms and I would be surprised if it affected your score...I hate to think what my score would have been with such an examiner. I also got distinction - perhaps we should swop examiners and do it again!
Martin - Bristol IAM: IMI National Observer and Group Secretary, DSA: ADI, Fleet, RoSPA (Dip)
martine
 
Posts: 4430
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Bristol, UK




PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Driving Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests