Horse wrote: That said, I've seen someone fall off at a standstill . . .
!
Where you there in winter 1965, when I did such, on a BSA Bantam at traffic lights?
Was sheet ice, so that's my excuse.
Horse wrote: That said, I've seen someone fall off at a standstill . . .
!
WhoseGeneration wrote:Horse wrote: That said, I've seen someone fall off at a standstill . . .
!
Where you there in winter 1965, when I did such, on a BSA Bantam at traffic lights?
Was sheet ice, so that's my excuse.
Horse wrote:https://maps.google.com/?ll=50.983141,-2.132356&spn=0.000027,0.017381&t=h&ecpose=50.98371761,-2.14551663,1130.61,90.973,44.274,0&z=16&layer=c&cbll=50.982963,-2.136057&panoid=2und8jJLGpMnEA7Xm1Kkpg&cbp=12,107.76,,0,4.23
If you mean heading East here, I'd happily go to the offside because I'd gain stability not view - it's possible to see all through the bend. That's straighlining as I said earlier:
Straightlining: moving beyond the centre line when a clear view of the full road width is available.
Now build a high wall on the left. Then that would be offsiding for view.
Horse wrote:WhoseGeneration wrote:Horse wrote: That said, I've seen someone fall off at a standstill . . .
!
Where you there in winter 1965, when I did such, on a BSA Bantam at traffic lights?
Was sheet ice, so that's my excuse.
Yes! I heard what you said: "It wasn't my fault, it was that sh*t ice!"
WhoseGeneration wrote:Horse wrote: That said, I've seen someone fall off at a standstill . . .
!
Were you there in winter 1965, when I did such, on a BSA Bantam at traffic lights?
Was sheet ice, so that's my excuse.
TripleS "Pah, you ought to have been around Fylingdales in January 1963. Then you'd know what it's all about. Huh, namby pamby southerners.
Ancient wrote:Meanwhile, back on topic:
What do those who say 'No offsiding to gain a view" do about a wall/hedge/side of a building coming close to the road edge and potentially hiding someone/something from view? Slow right down in case something appears? Ignore it and get past as quick as poss (I'm guessing not)? Or offside if the view if the road ahead can be seen to be safe?
I'm guessing the last - so that's one situation where offsiding to gain a view is acceptable, no?
Ancient wrote: I'm guessing the last - so that's one situation where offsiding to gain a view is acceptable, no?
Horse wrote:Ancient wrote: I'm guessing the last - so that's one situation where offsiding to gain a view is acceptable, no?
Or offsiding for safety?
I doubt moving a few feet across to the right will substantially improve view around a blind bend flanked by a wall (above that which a right-of-lane would give anyway) or into a blind entrance, at least not enough that you wouldn't need to slow anyway.
waremark wrote:Horse wrote:Ancient wrote: I'm guessing the last - so that's one situation where offsiding to gain a view is acceptable, no?
Or offsiding for safety?
I doubt moving a few feet across to the right will substantially improve view around a blind bend flanked by a wall (above that which a right-of-lane would give anyway) or into a blind entrance, at least not enough that you wouldn't need to slow anyway.
Accepting that the safe speed will be low either way, it will be significantly higher if positioned offside to maximise vision into and out of the nearside hazard.
Ancient wrote:So if offsiding is useful in these situations, what about a simple bend on a single carriageway (two lanes) road where the other lane is fully in view but my nearside lane is (at least partially) hidden? Again we know there is no oncoming but are not clear about what may be hidden around the corner. Do we accept offsideing here?
Ancient wrote: So if offsiding is useful in these situations, what about a simple bend on a single carriageway (two lanes) road where the other lane is fully in view but my nearside lane is (at least partially) hidden? Again we know there is no oncoming but are not clear about what may be hidden around the corner. Do we accept offsideing here?
Return to Advanced Driving Forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests