Page 2 of 2

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:34 am
by onlinegenie
Perhaps it's a different case:

"Mr Storey had been clocked doing 68.7mph in a 50mph roadworks area of the motorway.

The officer, who has not been named, pulled alongside him to indicate he should slow down and saw him driving one-handed while he ate the chocolate bar."

From May 2000.

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:15 pm
by Stephen
Im sure the officer will have learned a lesson which will be don't try and do anyone a favour by looking at a lesser offence, which it looked like he has done on this occassion.
It looks like it has back fired big time,so, a bollocking for doing 68.7mph in a 50mph which is in my boo k more dangerous if their are workers around,than if it was on lets say a national limit,I know it was a long time now but people wonder why the police behave like they do when they come across drivers like this.
I have done this lots of times and it has been ok,but there have been times when it back fires,but I still do it as not all people are like this one hopefully,thats life full of little learning curves.

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:18 pm
by Kimosabe
7db wrote:I'm just going to leave this here.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl7o1EB0sYI[/youtube]


Is that not supposed to happen then? Have I been reading a different bl**dy book this whole time?! I got if off a Chinese eBayer who swore to me it was the real deal. You'd have to know to be able to tell. I've been meaning to ask why nobody talks about the section on avoidance of Bullocks.

For the record though, His Dudeness 8) was 10-2PPing :twisted: but I think it was the Heel-Toe Braking (in slippers or possibly clogs) wot lead to his interesting parking skills. Good job someone filmed it. I love documentaries.



think I might go now... :|

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:22 pm
by Kimosabe
michael769 wrote:It was a couple of years go now: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/739005.stm :)


Storey
Kit-Kat
Break

"But on Saturday police gave Mr Storey, 33, from Grantham, Lincolnshire, a break, saying the fine was "inappropriate" and would be quashed."

Hmmm... someone's got shares in Cadburys' no doubt.

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:24 pm
by MGF
Or Nestle :)

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 7:09 pm
by Kimosabe
MGF wrote:Or Nestle :)



Heinous! That would make it a worse offence. It's the very reason for why I only eat Ferrero Rocher when driving; no faffing about, just in yer gob and wrapper out the window. Done.

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:22 pm
by cupraray
exportmanuk wrote:Just don't flick your lighted fag ends out of the window whilst driving along the road :twisted:

nice one

Re: Which is more dangerous/illegal?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:19 pm
by Kimosabe
7db wrote:I'm just going to leave this here.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl7o1EB0sYI[/youtube]



I see your Lebowski and raise you one of these: (1min 40secs onward)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPbymWrqXGc