The John Miles method of cornering.

Discussion on Advanced and Defensive Driving.

Postby TripleS » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:27 pm


Tosh wrote:
TripleS wrote:I appreciate that you were quoting extreme examples, and they deserve great respect; but a normal car being driven in a sensible and smooth manner on public roads is not going to get into difficulties on account of a modest amount/rate of weight transfer. The principles involved are pretty clear and undeniable, but we do seem to get in a tizzy rather too readily when contemplating or carrying out perfectly normal manoeuvres IMHO. That's all I'm suggesting.


All I was trying to point out was that the principles of smooth driving and cornering can be applied to any vehicle in any situation and even if the factors are exaggerated it will provide the best chance of getting a smooth and safe outcome.

Cornering in a normal road car at a normal (ish) speed will not produce an outcome that will be detrimental to stability but there are factors that might just come up at an inopportune moment that might just cause an exaggeration in one particular area, a sudden loss of grip due to a biker losing his bike on a bend an hour earlier and leaving a nice patch of oil just where grip is needed, for instance.

What I'm trying to show is that while all things are going in the intended direction and as they should then all things should be okay, throw a couple of unexpected factors in the mix and it could get a bit messy.
Would it not be a better outcome to provide the basis of a stable line from the beginning rather than rely on a reserve of tyre grip that might not be there to steer out of trouble mid corner? It might work for you and that I fully accept but it cannot be something that can be applied to any area of driving that goes slightly beyond the parameters of modest weight transfer, cornering forces or tyre or road surface adhesion.


I don't think I'm going to be able to convince you that I'm not running undue risks, am I? Never mind.
TripleS
 
Posts: 6025
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Briggswath, Whitby

Postby Tosh » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:08 pm


It's not for you to convince me that you are running undue risks. If you feel that your method causes you no issues I would readily accept that. My thoughts are that your method combined with your experience you are perfectly safe and competent. Put that same method into the hands of a less experienced or a driver with not the same appreciation for the limits of grip then it could, under circumstances that are not of someone's liking, be the meeting of car and hedge.
Tosh
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:33 pm

Postby TripleS » Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:34 pm


Tosh wrote:It's not for you to convince me that you are running undue risks. If you feel that your method causes you no issues I would readily accept that. My thoughts are that your method combined with your experience you are perfectly safe and competent. Put that same method into the hands of a less experienced or a driver with not the same appreciation for the limits of grip then it could, under circumstances that are not of someone's liking, be the meeting of car and hedge.


That's OK then. Rightly or wrongly I happen to feel that the various elements of my driving style are a pretty good (though not perfect) mix for enabling me to keep out of trouble, but they may not work for others. They need to find their own way, a way that may suit them better.

It's all very well reading the advanced driving books and debating these things with experts, but at the end of the day what really matters is how we, as individuals, do various things, and in what circumstances, that determines our degree of success...or failure.

Unless you wish to add anything further, I'm going to conclude that we have reached a satisfactory understanding. Thanks for your comments and ideas.
TripleS
 
Posts: 6025
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Briggswath, Whitby

Postby triquet » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:51 pm


And today's interesting example of weight transfer ...

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/116817 ... llingford/
Jim
Offshore Engineer and Master of Music
triquet
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:51 pm

Postby Horse » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:19 pm


triquet wrote:And today's interesting example of weight transfer ...

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/116817 ... llingford/


Here's a place where they occasionally fall over:

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&ll ... 55,,0,9.05

At the point where the blue HGV is heading away. Note its body roll!

There's a long, straight and deceptively wide approach - followed by a tight, narrow 'S' transit and exit. Poor junction design 'encouraging' poor assessment . . .
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby triquet » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:54 pm


This is where the HGV copped in this morning. Approach from Reading going towards Oxford, downhill onto a tight roundabout, with some curious cambering into the bargain ...

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.58732 ... !2e0?hl=en
Jim
Offshore Engineer and Master of Music
triquet
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:51 pm

Postby revian » Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:50 pm


triquet wrote:A centipede was happy – quite!
Until a toad in fun
Said, "Pray, which leg moves after which?"
This raised her doubts to such a pitch,
She fell exhausted in the ditch
Not knowing how to run.

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Rising from my 'sick bed' I'll simply express disappointment that ESP didn't find a mention..

:shock:

Ian
Wirral
revian
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 6:37 pm

Postby Tosh » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:44 pm


Horse wrote:
triquet wrote:And today's interesting example of weight transfer ...

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/116817 ... llingford/


Here's a place where they occasionally fall over:

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&ll ... 55,,0,9.05

At the point where the blue HGV is heading away. Note its body roll!

There's a long, straight and deceptively wide approach - followed by a tight, narrow 'S' transit and exit. Poor junction design 'encouraging' poor assessment . . .


Not to mention the pendulum effect created by that nifty bit of highway design. On the apporach and entry weight shifts right then once on the roundabout everthing is then shifted to the left side, except this time the weight has now gained momentum, just to make things even trickier. It is something that will catch out even the most experienced driver. All it takes is just a little too much speed carried and a rollover is very easy.
Tosh
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:33 pm

Postby TheInsanity1234 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:00 pm


You're all having a very interesting discussion on cornering and the physics involved.

And I'm just sitting here thinking "What's wrong with just turning the wheel to the required amount to prevent a close encounter of the car/tree kind?" :lol:
TheInsanity1234
 
Posts: 822
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:22 pm
Location: West Berkshire

Postby jcochrane » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:12 am


TheInsanity1234 wrote:You're all having a very interesting discussion on cornering and the physics involved.

And I'm just sitting here thinking "What's wrong with just turning the wheel to the required amount to prevent a close encounter of the car/tree kind?" :lol:

Welcome to the world of Advanced Driving aka driving anoraks.
jcochrane
 
Posts: 1877
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: East Surrey and wherever good driving roads can be found.

Postby Gareth » Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:07 am


TheInsanity1234 wrote:And I'm just sitting here thinking "What's wrong with just turning the wheel to the required amount to prevent a close encounter of the car/tree kind?" :lol:

Factors like the rate of travel and the rate of steering ...
there is only the road, nothing but the road ...
Gareth
 
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Berkshire




Postby TripleS » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:07 am


Tosh wrote:
Horse wrote:
triquet wrote:And today's interesting example of weight transfer ...

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/116817 ... llingford/


Here's a place where they occasionally fall over:

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&ll ... 55,,0,9.05

At the point where the blue HGV is heading away. Note its body roll!

There's a long, straight and deceptively wide approach - followed by a tight, narrow 'S' transit and exit. Poor junction design 'encouraging' poor assessment . . .


Not to mention the pendulum effect created by that nifty bit of highway design. On the apporach and entry weight shifts right then once on the roundabout everthing is then shifted to the left side, except this time the weight has now gained momentum, just to make things even trickier. It is something that will catch out even the most experienced driver. All it takes is just a little too much speed carried and a rollover is very easy.


Rather than saying "will", do you mind if we make it "could"? :wink:

You're right about speed though. A bit too much of that, and the situation could become unmanageable, with or without ESP. 8)
TripleS
 
Posts: 6025
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:47 pm
Location: Briggswath, Whitby

Postby Horse » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:41 am


Same effect caught out several trafpols with early Range Rovers, though ;)

A local copper explained that there was noticeable lag on the body roll through corners, probably worsened by all the floodlights'n'stuff on the roof.

First bend, body lags slightly behind . . .
Second bend, that worsens . . .
Third bend of a sequence, the body could end up like a pendulum, out of time, swinging back to the outside, half way around the corner.

IIRC a few ended upside down in fields.
Anything posted by 'Horse' may be (C) Malcolm Palmer. Please ask for permission before considering any copying or re-use outside of forum posting.
User avatar
Horse
 
Posts: 2811
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:40 pm
Location: Darkest Berkshoire

Postby WhoseGeneration » Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:27 pm


Horse wrote:Same effect caught out several trafpols with early Range Rovers, though ;)


Current ones though, no comparison, how such an amount of metal can be hustled is testament to, yes, digital control and engineers' abilities to exploit the digital world.
Always a commentary, spoken or not.
Keeps one safe. One hopes.
WhoseGeneration
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby akirk » Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:30 am


Horse wrote:Same effect caught out several trafpols with early Range Rovers, though ;)

A local copper explained that there was noticeable lag on the body roll through corners, probably worsened by all the floodlights'n'stuff on the roof.

First bend, body lags slightly behind . . .
Second bend, that worsens . . .
Third bend of a sequence, the body could end up like a pendulum, out of time, swinging back to the outside, half way around the corner.

IIRC a few ended upside down in fields.


It is why they are so good off-road - just straightline the bends (across the fields!)

Alasdair
akirk
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Cotswolds

PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Driving Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests