revian wrote:http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=russels+hall+hospital&aq=&sll=53.800651,1.40625&sspn=15.35132,46.538086&ie=UTF8&hq=russels+hall+hospital&hnear=&layer=c&cbll=52.504023,-2.101087&panoid=C9wVZhSJsyjw_c9Dcp27dA&cbp=12,222.5,,0,2.48&ll=52.504023,-2.101087&spn=0,0.077162&z=14
But not a right turn... I've list the will to live in reading all the thread...again..
Ian
StressedDave wrote:GJD wrote:Why are you attempting to ascribe to this road marking a level of mandatory-ness that simply does not exist? If the law meant the road marking to be mandatory, the law would say the road marking is mandatory. The fact that it doesn't leaves only one possible conclusion: it must be the case that going against this road marking is not necessarily illegal. The alternative conclusion is irrational.
It's a little more muddy than that... in finest fashion the 'must' in the Highway Code is indeed that - something which is proscribed by law and automatically attracts points. 'should' means you can do it, but if anything happens whatsoever, including inconveniencing other drivers, then it's contrary to s3.
Return to Advanced Driving Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests