vonhosen wrote:7db wrote:vonhosen wrote:I'd personally disagree with calling the nearest hazard the limit point as for me it is a term describing vision of road surface.
I agree that's the classical definition. You can think of it either way - that the limit point is not the nearest hazard, or that "straight on" is not the relevant limiting direction.
After all, it is often that the furthest unbroken view of road surface is behind me...
To corrupt Porker's advice - it's about not committing to a bit of road that you haven't had a good look not just at it, but at what might come onto it.
I often find it's a wonder that I ever get anywhere at all with any speed...
Well that's because the developed human brain is a fantastic piece of kit, just as are the other pieces that feed it information, such as the eyes.
We can learn to spot, process & priortise multiple hazards at great speed (certainly much faster than I can type about it here ) whilst using our well trained limbs to deftly change position & speed of the vehicle.
It's a beautiful display of biology, mechanics & art, intricately woven to prodcuce a masterpiece (well at least that's what it should be).
My dear colleaugue, you missed the most important one, CHEMISTRY with the road!!!