James wrote:When do these cameras plan to be running by and do they have to be painted yellow?
SammyTheSnake wrote:James wrote:When do these cameras plan to be running by and do they have to be painted yellow?
I've always been unsure whether the "painted yellow" thing was a good idea or not.
On the one hand, painting them yellow makes them easy to spot which emphasises the "preventative" part of their nature. On the other hand, if they were more covert, then they surely have the potential to be effective over a larger area, avoiding the behaviour pattern of people slowing down only right where the camera is...
Any opinions on that?
Cheers & God bless
Sam "SammyTheSnake" Penny
James wrote:When do these cameras plan to be running by and do they have to be painted yellow?
Big Err wrote:James wrote:When do these cameras plan to be running by and do they have to be painted yellow?
The yellow or high visibility marked cameras/vans are a requirement for the operation of a safety camera scheme. No revenue will be returned to a camera partnership if the location used does not meet the requirements/does not have camera signs on the approaches/is not painted yellow or situated in a hi visi marked vehicle. This doesnt mean that the camera cannot be used and fines dished out, it only means that all the revenue will go to central government with no return to the operator.
I don't know if the cameras in the article will fall into a camera partnership scheme.
Eric
Big Err wrote:The yellow or high visibility marked cameras/vans are a requirement for the operation of a safety camera scheme. No revenue will be returned to a camera partnership if the location used does not meet the requirements/does not have camera signs on the approaches/is not painted yellow or situated in a hi visi marked vehicle. This doesnt mean that the camera cannot be used and fines dished out, it only means that all the revenue will go to central government with no return to the operator.
Nigel wrote:In principle I can see the benefits of these, we all witness missuse of bus lanes, wrong way up one way streets, parking on double yellows to get a bag of chips etc (normally accompanied by an admission of guilt by switching their hazard lights on ).
But in principle I could see the benefits of speed cameras to start with...then it just became an anti car crusade.
What it should mean is the local authorities will have to clean their act up on road markings and signage, in Worcester we have a box junction that the driver cannot see the exit before he enters it, we also have a large A road direction sign that shows what lane is for which direction (four lanes), then the road markings actually show something different.
Does anyone know the legality of some road signs ? (Von for example), as I'm seeing more & more blue background signs used on non motorway roads.
Nigel wrote:I'm seeing more and more blue background speed limit signs, and in Devon I've even seen parts of the highway code on large blue background signs.
Return to Announcements, Improvements and Forum Help
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests