Adamxck wrote:Perhaps I should try an 'S' then. TBH I assumed it would be very similar, just a touch faster.
StressedDave wrote:jont wrote:Adamxck wrote:Perhaps I should try an 'S' then. TBH I assumed it would be very similar, just a touch faster.
I nearly started this thread naming the Boxster, but I thought people had got bored of me calling it a bit "meh" Appears it may not just be me.
Can I retract my earlier answer? I've driven jont's car... a prime example of what happens when the engineers believe, after reading the 'how to build a proper car' book, decide to feed it into a shredder and throw any old crap together.
martine wrote:I'm hoping 'Mr. Cholmondely-Warner' or 'Stefan Einz' are going to reaffirm my belief the Boxster S (and Cayman S) are actually great cars...Nick/Steve...please...
jont wrote:martine wrote:I'm hoping 'Mr. Cholmondely-Warner' or 'Stefan Einz' are going to reaffirm my belief the Boxster S (and Cayman S) are actually great cars...Nick/Steve...please...
I think the problem Adamxck and I have with them is that they are /too/ good.
jont wrote:martine wrote:I'm hoping 'Mr. Cholmondely-Warner' or 'Stefan Einz' are going to reaffirm my belief the Boxster S (and Cayman S) are actually great cars...Nick/Steve...please...
I think the problem Adamxck and I have with them is that they are /too/ good.
sussex2 wrote:If I was to be put on the spot and had to write a list the following would be on the bad list:
Most Jaguars until the most recent additions.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests