jont wrote:What about chosing a safe speed within that?
ScoobyChris wrote:jont wrote:What about chosing a safe speed within that?
I was surprised that not one of the opposing groups mentioned that! Maybe this is the IAM's opportunity to do some lobbying
Chris
ScoobyChris wrote:jont wrote:What about chosing a safe speed within that?
I was surprised that not one of the opposing groups mentioned that! Maybe this is the IAM's opportunity to do some lobbying
Chris
Custom24 wrote:"The IAM, contributors to the government's Motorists' Forum, has backedthe scheme but would like to see new digital speed maps at the heart ofthe ISA system prioritise potentially lethal rural roads."
Custom24 wrote:ScoobyChris wrote:jont wrote:What about chosing a safe speed within that?
I was surprised that not one of the opposing groups mentioned that! Maybe this is the IAM's opportunity to do some lobbying
Chris
No such luck.
I've just got a circular email from the IAM on this subject.
"The IAM, contributors to the government's Motorists' Forum, has backed the scheme but would like to see new digital speed maps at the heart of the ISA system prioritise potentially lethal rural roads."
I am very surprised that the IAM is in favour of such policies. It's making me question my membership, which I need to continue Observing...
TripleS wrote:I still don't get this 'dangerous roads' business.
ROG wrote:Any money put into this would be better spent on compulsory driver education and ongoing assessing.
ROG wrote:Any money put into this would be better spent on compulsory driver education and ongoing assessing.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests