Custom24 wrote:If I've understood the math on the previous page of this thread correctly, 79.4%
Porker wrote:martine wrote:There's also the IAM Special Assessment which is not a test but is meant to use similar criteria to a police advanced assessment - although how you go about training for this is not clear...ask Mr. Toad!
I suspect that similar criteria are used but that the standards required are lower in as much as the speeds are typically rather less.
That would be interesting to have confirmed though. For example, would an IAM SA candidate who achieves a 90% pass on the exam be demonstrating the same level of roadcraft, commentary, finesse and so on as someone who passes a Police Advanced Course with the same mark?
Even then I expect it's something of a moot point, since demonstrating skills at higher speeds would I presume be proportionately much more difficult than doing so within the speed limits.
regards
P.
adiNigel wrote:If all categories are equally weighted I would have made it 94.8%.
20 x 100% = 2000
7 x 80% = 560
Total 2560
Divide by 27 to give 94.81481
Nigel
GS wrote:Does this sound like an IAM SA?
GS wrote:I'm sure that when the mark is added up it is then multiplied by a set figure to give the final result. That way there is a noticeable difference between marks.
(I'm guessing around the 85 to 87% area.)
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests