"Imprecise operation of the indicator stalk"?
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Call me naive, but surely there are more important things in life, or at least driving, that have a more direct impact on safety, than which way you grasp the knobs?
Mr Cholmondeley-Warner wrote:"Imprecise operation of the indicator stalk"?![]()
Call me naive, but surely there are more important things in life, or at least driving, that have a more direct impact on safety, than which way you grasp the knobs?
MrToad wrote:A calculation which is then multiplied by something sounds plausible - the actual figure was 89%.
Interestingly, two of the comments you made when we drove together last year were repeated during the test (sorry, assessment) - slightly close following position and imprecise operation of the indicator stalk. It appears that the things Police instructors look for are remarkably consistent across the country.
waremark wrote:Fenland Flyer posted an explanation last year - if I understand him correctly it would give 87% for 20 1's and 7 2's, 89% would suggest only 6 2's. ...
This is what FF said: ...
Custom24 wrote:The only other way I can think of would be a simple % of the total possible mark, for which we need to convert the scores so the 1's become 5's, 2's become 4's, etc
Fenland Flyer wrote:7 x 2's and 20 x 1's gives a mark of 74%
Fenland Flyer wrote:I should have given Mr. Toad 79% in my previous post
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests