ROG wrote:Are we not in that same situation as observers?
The only way around that one would be for the driver & "trainer" to claim that the driver was giving a lift to the "trainer"
vonhosen wrote:Why don't you just do the ADI & get your work to cover the costs for it ?
hpcdriver wrote:vonhosen wrote:Why don't you just do the ADI & get your work to cover the costs for it ?
ROG has told us he cannot pass the HPT as he is not able to identify hazards quickly in a 2D picture - that lies behind his attempt to find a way to instruct for his employer without being an ADI. I think he has had a clear steer from the forum, but understandably he does not welcome the message.
What about getting his work colleagues to sign up as IAM Associates? If he takes them out as IAM Associates noone is going to be bothered whether or not it happens in work time. I think. But his group might be a bit upset if none of them went on to take the IAM test.
hpcdriver wrote:What about getting his work colleagues to sign up as IAM Associates? If he takes them out as IAM Associates noone is going to be bothered whether or not it happens in work time. I think. But his group might be a bit upset if none of them went on to take the IAM test.
ROG wrote:They are willing and legally able to adjust the on-screen test but are not legally able to offer an alternative to it.
Return to General Car Chat Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests